[tcpm] (Mini)Review: draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-00

Alexander Zimmermann <zimmermann@i4.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> Wed, 09 July 2008 14:18 UTC

Return-Path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tcpm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C290F28C160; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 07:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 648713A6AC2 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 07:18:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HELO_MISMATCH_DE=1.448, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y-Lc7A2LJqRg for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 07:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-i4.informatik.rwth-aachen.de (mail-i4.informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.12.21]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084933A6AC7 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 07:18:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from info-4.informatik.rwth-aachen.de (cronos.info-4.informatik.rwth-aachen.de [137.226.12.31]) by mail-i4.informatik.rwth-aachen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9306578BB for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 16:18:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from chicago.info-4.informatik.rwth-aachen.de ([137.226.12.187]) by info-4.informatik.rwth-aachen.de over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 9 Jul 2008 16:18:14 +0200
Message-Id: <C4F5A0FB-AE3B-49A5-BBB5-86C2B5135AE2@i4.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
From: Alexander Zimmermann <zimmermann@i4.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
To: tcpm@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926)
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:18:14 +0200
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail d51 (Leopard)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jul 2008 14:18:14.0708 (UTC) FILETIME=[A0301F40:01C8E1CE]
Cc: braden@isi.edu, david.borman@windriver.com, van@packetdesign.com
Subject: [tcpm] (Mini)Review: draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-00
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0634874389=="
Sender: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

Hi folks,

here some comments:

page 6, 2**31/B: In my opinion a short reason or a reference why   
2**31 and not for example 2**32-1 is correct would be nice.
page 14, figures: The new (upper) figure is  (from step 5 on)  
incorrect. TSval should be 65 in step 5, isn't it? Hmm, we have also  
two steps with number 5...
page 15, paragraph 3: The last sentence is incomplete.
page 34, point (b): It should be TS.Recent and not TSrecent, right?

Regards,
Alex

//
// Dipl.-Inform. Alexander Zimmermann
// Department of Computer Science 4, RWTH Aachen University
// Ahornstr. 55, 52074 Aachen, Germany
// phone: (49-241) 80-21422, fax: (49-241) 80-22220
// email: zimmermann@cs.rwth-aachen.de
// web: http://www.umic-mesh.net
//

_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm