[tcpm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-14.txt
Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Tue, 30 July 2019 17:56 UTC
Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AACF1201F3 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pW72ejEj8eJc for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:56:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2d.google.com (mail-io1-xd2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 527171201ED for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:56:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2d.google.com with SMTP id j6so10380345ioa.5 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:56:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:references:to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=d0XjghlW4S8XxCoOB3qAFQ/B6P3Pugncgb6Y66/tQSg=; b=yndK57sbu53+2iPraXq5db0nJIndLsS4s5q4niiOVsGIiuH3TYjxot/TxLRDdzLwmv mHqqieaJhgjsGgwmDD8i87YEYCLBVrQvmC/C6mkP3Og8Jb0BF0gyMCSJRCX6cE9PeaaS gk11KIjvmurwV4wCG/SwP/FJIVP8k6r+LWifKQeK9EN0QLXLt7JkuMV/Up9S9SqDRnNq K4vmRkx+caOxkjQp8VgY9VNhlCPtrDIss+jwnx06cJhVFuNsvR3vJcO9JFjC4NSn+37T yV9REm0qWio8qEcjJ5xbXJCFkPSBw7EByTXF+GNpBM7ANUrUUFFlHQiumxCPFS7ZJnqq lmHw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:references:to:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=d0XjghlW4S8XxCoOB3qAFQ/B6P3Pugncgb6Y66/tQSg=; b=f+8ClROuYS4TSY8YXyiJ6LmS2XONV0mLiVE3vqr8A5S9qfpF+hecBXjxn3F/mSoLAZ UMBZkqt7Dtjt1LIjOMxpfbLzeNBhPROAWkBSmHdLANFnWAW1UwyO+lfVD2for3Wv//D4 2I+fLJAsfxfL3CcRY63ucRpQp67z5Iwv33GY2W0U7vnO9XCgPoOsULq62Vamr1AX8R54 2Q8n5ELVyTZ5dDY13+36o66mISarwDQ0K327bW0uuvwOJrvyVavOKm+WvMKyPdOlGjpW kH6MBQixlAxECzbD/tQ6D8Qyu1slVZkC45AYqYMwjItS27WL5feBcrKhrh1nGHA8dylb 9D/A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWUYqVsAfUPk7U1nWdwI5sQqNLnCKxWtCocRDpZ+IFSi9awXKNO DxkccdsBo1raqzyWogvWORDKa9m7
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzflNAU5J9ah6Okfo7EcBv12xFIIPnuVUMWOVLClXQZeMjUuWAVgREHxxWXMIn5hS0uuIHq9w==
X-Received: by 2002:a5e:d618:: with SMTP id w24mr19791417iom.73.1564509402505; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.119] (rrcs-69-135-1-122.central.biz.rr.com. [69.135.1.122]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e22sm49855080iob.66.2019.07.30.10.56.41 for <tcpm@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
References: <156450882804.14172.17458284787319017749.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: tcpm IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <156450882804.14172.17458284787319017749.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <10a8eba2-0d55-bd5d-ad22-4884f485a3de@mti-systems.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:56:39 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <156450882804.14172.17458284787319017749.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------46C7CFE1476C865BA66146F4"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/G0ALn2ZRc8nFty-f5NzRAiHiYiw>
Subject: [tcpm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-14.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 17:56:46 -0000
Hello, this incorporates some small cleanups that accumulated prior to the IETF meeting, as well as some of the feedback received since then on the mailing list. A couple specific things not yet done (because it doesn't look like we converged on the list yet): - Did not yet change reserved bits to "unassigned" (nor indicate them in the IANA considerations section). Rod Grimes has a good point about these being very commonly referred to as "the reserved bits" in other places. I'm thinking we could add a note to say that in IANA terms they're "Unassigned" to add the clarity that Mohamed is advocating, but not change the name? - Did not yet move section 2.1. - Did not yet remove the note about my confusion on MUST vs SHOULD regarding reporting of excessive retransmissions in RFC 1122 (will confirm on the mailing list the "no change" proposal that was suggested at the meeting) -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-14.txt Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:47:08 -0700 From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: Wesley M. Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>, Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-14.txt has been successfully submitted by Wesley M. Eddy and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis Revision: 14 Title: Transmission Control Protocol Specification Document date: 2019-07-30 Group: tcpm Pages: 104 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-14.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-14 Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-14 Abstract: This document specifies the Internet's Transmission Control Protocol (TCP). TCP is an important transport layer protocol in the Internet stack, and has continuously evolved over decades of use and growth of the Internet. Over this time, a number of changes have been made to TCP as it was specified in RFC 793, though these have only been documented in a piecemeal fashion. This document collects and brings those changes together with the protocol specification from RFC 793. This document obsoletes RFC 793, as well as 879, 2873, 6093, 6429, 6528, and 6691 that updated parts of RFC 793. It updates RFC 1122, and should be considered as a replacement for the portions of that document dealing with TCP requirements. It updates RFC 5961 due to a small clarification in reset handling while in the SYN-RECEIVED state. RFC EDITOR NOTE: If approved for publication as an RFC, this should be marked additionally as "STD: 7" and replace RFC 793 in that role. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat
- [tcpm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ie… Wesley Eddy
- Re: [tcpm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draf… Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: [tcpm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draf… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [tcpm] New Version Notification for draft-iet… Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] New Version Notification for draft-iet… mohamed.boucadair