[tcpm] Side meeting to discuss TCP Security document

David Borman <david.borman@windriver.com> Sun, 07 November 2010 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <david.borman@windriver.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67DF53A63EC for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 06:20:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.39
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.39 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.209, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UjYE95h28jVR for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 06:20:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7DD3A6403 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 06:20:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ALA-MAIL03.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-mail03 [147.11.57.144]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oA7EKYNC029375; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 06:20:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ala-mail06.corp.ad.wrs.com ([147.11.57.147]) by ALA-MAIL03.corp.ad.wrs.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 7 Nov 2010 06:20:33 -0800
Received: from [172.31.18.89] ([147.11.69.4]) by ala-mail06.corp.ad.wrs.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 7 Nov 2010 06:20:33 -0800
From: David Borman <david.borman@windriver.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2010 22:20:28 +0800
Message-Id: <78DB0ABC-24D1-41E1-BCC5-F70A950AD9C0@windriver.com>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Nov 2010 14:20:34.0359 (UTC) FILETIME=[F0F66C70:01CB7E86]
Cc: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
Subject: [tcpm] Side meeting to discuss TCP Security document
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2010 14:20:20 -0000

In Anaheim we had a small session to look at the TCP Security document, attended by a hand full of people.  We are interested in doing this again here in Beijing.  The goal is to go through some more of the document and come up with some recommendations for how to move forward with revising/editing the document, which will then be brought back to the list.

So, there are 2 questions:
1) Who is interested in attending?
2) When should we meet?  My recommendations for possibilities are, in order of preference:
	1) Tuesday morning (NFSv4 meets at this time)
	2) Wednesday after lunch (No TSV groups meet at this time)
	3) Thursday morning (Congestion Exposure WG meets at this time)
Please reply to me or the list if you are interested in this, and if so, which of those 3 periods you are available. Once we see who is interested and when they would be available, I'll see about finding a place to meet, but it won't be a regular session room, i.e. there won't be any remote participation.

			-David Borman, TCPM co-chair