IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of draft-eggert-tcpm-rfc8312bis-02

tuexen@fh-muenster.de Fri, 12 March 2021 14:29 UTC

Return-Path: <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979503A0E7B; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 06:29:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.879
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hekYB8SRj_-6; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 06:29:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from drew.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B24D3A0CEA; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 06:29:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:8109:1140:c3d:790a:9a38:8bc5:2209] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8109:1140:c3d:790a:9a38:8bc5:2209]) (Authenticated sender: macmic) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B139D70649FBF; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:29:44 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
From: tuexen@fh-muenster.de
In-Reply-To: <AAC7444C-D68D-4BC3-897C-8E88554949AF@fh-muenster.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:29:44 +0100
Cc: draft-eggert-tcpm-rfc8312bis@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <505F3286-4918-41EF-82A3-CF560DF18825@fh-muenster.de>
References: <AAC7444C-D68D-4BC3-897C-8E88554949AF@fh-muenster.de>
To: tcpm IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/GAdIBoRp034g_reMtJKzjqdOT68>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of draft-eggert-tcpm-rfc8312bis-02
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:29:58 -0000

> On 25. Feb 2021, at 22:44, Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de> wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> this mail starts a two week WG adoption call for
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-eggert-tcpm-rfc8312bis-02
> The intended status would be PS.
> 
> So I would like to solicit feedback regarding support for or objections against the
> adoption of the document as a WG document in TCPM, if it hasn't been already sent to
> the list.
> 
> Please provide feedback before March 11th.
Thank you to all who provided feedback. This mail concludes the WG adoption call.
Since there has been substantial positive feedback and no negative feedback,
the document is adopted.

I would like to ask the authors to
* submit draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-00
* provide the chairs with a date for the milestone.

Best regards
Michael
> 
> Best regards
> Michael
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email