IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Increasing the Initial Window - Notes

<L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk> Fri, 12 November 2010 14:07 UTC

Return-Path: <L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16353A6886 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 06:07:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r09YM1S-wdqZ for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 06:07:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail78.messagelabs.com (mail78.messagelabs.com [195.245.230.131]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD7F53A68A6 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 06:07:03 -0800 (PST)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk
X-Msg-Ref: server-2.tower-78.messagelabs.com!1289570855!39868194!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.9; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [131.227.200.35]
Received: (qmail 13469 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2010 14:07:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO EXHT021P.surrey.ac.uk) (131.227.200.35) by server-2.tower-78.messagelabs.com with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP; 12 Nov 2010 14:07:35 -0000
Received: from EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk ([169.254.1.245]) by EXHT021P.surrey.ac.uk ([131.227.200.35]) with mapi; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:07:35 +0000
From: L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk
To: mellia@tlc.polito.it
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:05:28 +0000
Thread-Topic: [tcpm] Increasing the Initial Window - Notes
Thread-Index: AcuCcnjMFe/7Uj+qRBOR8mATXl3QhQAADCMw
Message-ID: <FD7B10366AE3794AB1EC5DE97A93A37316BF4314A0@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
References: <20101110152857.GA5094@hell> <AANLkTi=RzbPbVRDQh7y-ydY-P7H16wDri=8EtXP5QuV3@mail.gmail.com> <20101111012453.GB2691@hell> <29E76BE6-32D9-45AD-85A1-791DAADDE520@ifi.uio.no> <AANLkTik69zRJ7XcWK7ZKCYaHPP0=Z6hnhP1SUnYP=d=8@mail.gmail.com> <824FC88F-4877-45DC-AFD9-E5272ACD7C3E@ifi.uio.no> <4CDBCA4E.8000705@tlc.polito.it> <9C745827-D861-45D0-B096-AFC3E4FE5182@ifi.uio.no> <AANLkTinMKHVf_HAQ-YT8K-Tq9jdmpqQXdgnQyS8+gAcd@mail.gmail.com> <FD7B10366AE3794AB1EC5DE97A93A37316BF44877D@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>, <4CDD493B.6000201@tlc.polito.it>
In-Reply-To: <4CDD493B.6000201@tlc.polito.it>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, en-GB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: tmrg-interest@icsi.berkeley.edu, tcpm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Increasing the Initial Window - Notes
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:07:10 -0000

The point is that implementations don't toe the lne on number of connections per host (6 connections per hostname? Not persistent flows, but actual TCP connections?), and we're not going to move the line to suit them.

The same goes for initial window, I think.

Lloyd Wood
http://tinyurl.com/lloydwood-ccsr
________________________________________
From: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org [tcpm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marco Mellia [mellia@tlc.polito.it]
Sent: 12 November 2010 14:03
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org; tmrg-interest@icsi.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Increasing the Initial Window - Notes

well...
check this then
http://www.browserscope.org/
in the networking statistics...


Il 12/11/2010 10:48, L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk ha scritto:
> > If today a brower opens 10 flows with a server using IW=1 you gets 10
> packets equivalent IW
> And the browser is ignoring RFC 2068 section 8.1:
>     Clients that use persistent connections SHOULD limit the number of
>     simultaneous connections that they maintain to a given server. A
>     single-user client SHOULD maintain AT MOST 2 connections with any
>     server or proxy.

--

Ciao,                    /\/\/\rco

+-----------------------------------+
| Marco Mellia - Assistant Professor|
| Skypeid: mgmellia                 |
| Tel: +39-011-090-4173             |
| Cel: +39-331-6714789              |   /"\  .. . . . . . . . . . . . .
| Politecnico di Torino             |   \ /  . ASCII Ribbon Campaign  .
| Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24       |    X   .- NO HTML/RTF in e-mail .
| Torino - 10129 - Italy            |   / \  .- NO Word docs in e-mail.
| http://www.telematica.polito.it   |        .. . . . . . . . . . . . .
+-----------------------------------+
The box said "Requires Windows 95 or Better." So I installed Linux.

_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email