Re: [tcpm] Review of draft-wang-tcpm-low-latency-opt-00
Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org> Sun, 06 August 2017 18:17 UTC
Return-Path: <jgh@wizmail.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1BD129B2A for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Aug 2017 11:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id njFUnZzg2w2o for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Aug 2017 11:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wizmail.org (wizmail.org [IPv6:2a00:1940:107::2:0:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15629132043 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Aug 2017 11:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [2a00:b900:109e:0:c5d6:c61b:f5e0:b51f] (helo=lap.dom.ain) by wizmail.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89.113) id 1deQ71-0003pZ-4q for tcpm@ietf.org (return-path <jgh@wizmail.org>); Sun, 06 Aug 2017 18:17:15 +0000
To: tcpm@ietf.org
References: <8abadc4d-4165-a5bc-23bb-e4f9258c695b@bobbriscoe.net> <CAK6E8=c4D0QTzMobMQXLZMU5JiBRXXPdYJ0KTqvg08t+G0VDxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CANn89iL+TC6sh=e+keb4Psxz+E6oHV3Mcvsay6UYL2qEKUT6bw@mail.gmail.com> <2131135f-b123-70f0-d464-dac6640d6cd2@bobbriscoe.net> <d2570431-8c01-d7fc-5aa3-581d69836923@bobbriscoe.net> <CADVnQykz_pUqQLRmzpUd+E0R0iLWeZ3fZN=_K9Roee0zuz1x6A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org>
Message-ID: <81bd3c24-20d7-7de8-45c6-98daa7b95d18@wizmail.org>
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2017 19:17:13 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CADVnQykz_pUqQLRmzpUd+E0R0iLWeZ3fZN=_K9Roee0zuz1x6A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Pcms-Received-Sender: [2a00:b900:109e:0:c5d6:c61b:f5e0:b51f] (helo=lap.dom.ain) with esmtpsa
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/GjJo92b-Zr_Wy3GNaafq-fz_88M>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Review of draft-wang-tcpm-low-latency-opt-00
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2017 18:17:20 -0000
The draft proposes a SYN-time option to notify a MAD value for the connection. Would it not be preferable to use a data-time option, permitting an implementation to track (from the TCP endpoint's view) the application response time, adjusting the delayed-ACK timer to suit - and notifying the peer occasionally? -- Cheers, Jeremy
- [tcpm] New individual (int-area) draft minimizing… Bob Briscoe
- [tcpm] Review of draft-wang-tcpm-low-latency-opt-… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tcpm] Review of draft-wang-tcpm-low-latency-… Wei Wang
- Re: [tcpm] Review of draft-wang-tcpm-low-latency-… Neal Cardwell
- Re: [tcpm] Review of draft-wang-tcpm-low-latency-… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tcpm] Review of draft-wang-tcpm-low-latency-… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tcpm] Review of draft-wang-tcpm-low-latency-… Jeremy Harris
- Re: [tcpm] Review of draft-wang-tcpm-low-latency-… Jeremy Harris