IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] WG acceptance of draft-touch-tcpm-ao-test-vectors

"Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de> Mon, 05 April 2021 19:37 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5E43A24DD; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 12:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hs-esslingen.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id arv57Zi66vdM; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 12:37:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hs-esslingen.de (mail.hs-esslingen.de [134.108.32.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D39B3A24DC; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 12:37:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hs-esslingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A5C425A2E; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 21:37:32 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hs-esslingen.de; s=mail; t=1617651452; bh=mZ5nTNGxPU/h7l4/lGfS8s4Bb0EZh5Ch6yMKiLRurFo=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=b22edJL+ledmveFZks3spZOOuuLogg5xHmsRzgC7iw3WMPxDyC6YFJJwlngMzgON7 FzkDxT4E+gBNQCNsxZ2h9vjtC2VzfqGTwrBhrxbA76gLAqYrTXuK42nB+up2aJPVRO qt1o8bY3gfEvKNWsDnHU7exvpktnJ66Kr9PIEuQY=
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.7.1 (20120429) (Debian) at hs-esslingen.de
Received: from mail.hs-esslingen.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hs-esslingen.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0-9RDBi1rDyZ; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 21:37:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from rznt8201.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de (rznt8201.hs-esslingen.de [134.108.48.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hs-esslingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 21:37:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from rznt8202.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de (134.108.48.165) by rznt8201.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de (134.108.48.164) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 21:37:30 +0200
Received: from rznt8202.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de ([fe80::aca4:171a:3ee1:57e0]) by rznt8202.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de ([fe80::aca4:171a:3ee1:57e0%3]) with mapi id 15.01.2176.009; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 21:37:30 +0200
From: "Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
To: tcpm IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>
CC: tcpm-chairs <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG acceptance of draft-touch-tcpm-ao-test-vectors
Thread-Index: AdcXUoVwsaN/3P3lS4aR3KKf6cfKYQTAA0Xw
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 19:37:30 +0000
Message-ID: <7a23db702b7442ae84d598b357184a3c@hs-esslingen.de>
References: <47ebaa639de147f4bb1812982ff67ab8@hs-esslingen.de>
In-Reply-To: <47ebaa639de147f4bb1812982ff67ab8@hs-esslingen.de>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [134.108.140.248]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/HG2M2oPdlRx3va4yTA1eMCRu0Sk>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] WG acceptance of draft-touch-tcpm-ao-test-vectors
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2021 19:37:41 -0000

Hi all,

There has been no pushback. Therefore, this document is accepted as new TCPM working group item.

@authors: Please resubmit the I-D as draft-ietf-tcpm-ao-test-vectors.

Thanks

Michael

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scharf, Michael <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
> Sent: Friday, March 12, 2021 4:16 PM
> To: tcpm IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>
> Cc: tcpm-chairs <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>
> Subject: WG acceptance of draft-touch-tcpm-ao-test-vectors
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> During the TCPM meeting today there was positive feedback on working
> group
> acceptance of draft-touch-tcpm-ao-test-vectors.
> 
> This e-mail shall confirm adding a new milestone for an informational RFC on
> "TCP-AO Test Vectors" to the TCPM charter.
> 
> Any comments would be welcome. If there are no major concerns until
> March 26,
> the document will be accepted as new informational WG item in TCPM.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Michael S.
> 
> 
> PS: TCP-AO may be particularly relevant for TCP implementations on network
> devices (e.g., routers). One main use case for TCP-AO is securing the control
> plane inside networks (BGP, LDP, etc.). TCPM owns TCP-AO. There was a
> question
> in the room why the chairs have not asked the question "how many
> contributors
> have read this document?". Well, this document has to be relevant and
> useful
> to those who actually work on (new) TCP-AO implementations. And there
> are
> quite a number of recent reports on (new) running TCP-AO code, but none
> of
> them deals with desktop or server operating systems that are frequently
> discussed in TCPM. As long as proper review of this document can be
> ensured
> inside TCPM, it does not really matter what relative share of contributors
> actually work on TCP-AO. So, that question would not have given us much
> relevant insight.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email