[tcpm] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp-07: (with COMMENT)

Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 30 June 2022 07:48 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA701C15AD48; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:48:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp@ietf.org, tcpm-chairs@ietf.org, tcpm@ietf.org, nsd.ietf@gmail.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 8.5.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <165657530369.27520.9781177067868822401@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:48:23 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/HixjeOtbXG1k4NgerhmBzIBl-Bo>
Subject: [tcpm] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 07:48:23 -0000

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp-07: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


Just some editing suggestions:

In Section 1:

   ... This is conscious decision as these parameters
   hardly matter in a state-of-the-art TCP implementation.  It would
   also be possible also to translate a MIB into a YANG module, ...

Need "a" before "conscious", and drop one instance of "also".

Section 2.1 should probably indicate that there are lots of places where
"I-D.ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis" in the YANG module will need to be replaced by its
final RFC number.

Section 5.2:


   This document registers a YANG module in the "YANG Module Names"
   registry YANG - A Data Modeling Language [RFC6020].  Following the
   format in YANG - A Data Modeling Language [RFC6020], the following
   registration is requested:


   The following entry is requested to be added to the "YANG Module Names"
   registry created by [RFC6020]: