[tcpm] a question for TCPLS
Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 24 March 2022 03:35 UTC
Return-Path: <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 507463A1211 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 20:35:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tmab7J448QYi for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 20:35:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com (mail-wr1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3D0B3A1210 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 20:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id u3so4802829wrg.3 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 20:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=zMxljFtGirGn7V4REgTHe9dySOcUCPnO/nSCv1Hh2vc=; b=CCQaqiOqO8EDxWp/jC8U66ZyKCRibVTQE+0EWNPi6vbZ3ERDpmy2d0xF6zSNoUd93Q j3vXI1duaH7JE7vNfqvFlXYMv979fdimgm9i028gYz9riLoLMr3AUON5jqSfdzWA3EQX zFmAU8LwgXLtE/abyBYOUMyAUmfRkZsCGYisfLSSXryqhoTt9l2IE55DiLcU0xu8aJ87 XcPd1gS9CGDOOYowx4Jc+ZP/dkbB76epnKRkJ9k97QEoUVz+NlrEQrb+jtXEkpgDmX7W tfwfLWWuTqoL8ynuwbmCy2POUGb5gXLYvdZrqZG7IfJymiP18W2iMYWA241P/w9aXP6R qrkg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=zMxljFtGirGn7V4REgTHe9dySOcUCPnO/nSCv1Hh2vc=; b=h/2PlBhZ2st2AHebelTdEj2Nbw6Dy4XFELJ6Z9angcaZ8WUxoHNrvioI2tdzUetePO h/OsYhSFvnbLXwPqUrqpy556CPd7fpaSZaOkld4bgWDXVsWvVLOyJdsVfE8vezotAPLW sy4ojP+eHU7EEKCQm1ZJZDVUCJnUA7iKtSSDOlZZwJLf5qkkV3CTXo4tSRe+4iOX7PvO 2fn4Dh7mrunztE7lNBBkUyaKCgUx13KlX6qbHdYU9C0+WNpgbD+pCKj8eIgcXPi0HskI pIOy1FpF1jY2qs2nKkC06i+i63DrOta5ouDsHWhp3oovrqGWROjcav4A4XfREx55vtIc w3yA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531oq/tsxGDqFK+4uLiwTnWeq/yZnZv4yl2BKwT/DdQ6Ku+LgdWx +vfdC/Ds2uwVe6ffOPTdv1zdeB94ii5bsVq6KtQqH1aT
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzTuvLJbpcW5bXfggj/un9LsGOpW/PY3oiHufB9dfetDmVZt2aSwAMTRq27sBOHxjg7n1O6K30Zdq2TdzukmME=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:fbcf:0:b0:204:61b:2c4b with SMTP id d15-20020adffbcf000000b00204061b2c4bmr2663511wrs.125.1648092902022; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 20:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 20:34:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAK044QJ+_Kzk3b7kjuqQu1ReKFUYbPXebi0hRYnuQpm46umQQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fb5fac05daee874d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/HtaLeOoduORFO0cAxLjmOqbeFFo>
Subject: [tcpm] a question for TCPLS
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 03:35:15 -0000
Hi, I tried to ask a question for TCPLS during the presentation, but gave up due to time constraints. So, I just sent it here before my memory expires... In my understanding, the advantage of MPTCP is it's in the TCP stack so that it can have fine-grade packet scheduling and path management. But, in case of TCPLS, I'm not sure how it can control multiple TCP connections effectively. For example, I am wondering how TCPLS finds the failure of connections or which packets have been considered lost at the TCP layer without delay. Can you provide some more info about this point? Thanks, -- Yoshi
- [tcpm] a question for TCPLS Yoshifumi Nishida
- Re: [tcpm] a question for TCPLS Maxime Piraux
- Re: [tcpm] a question for TCPLS Scharf, Michael