IETF Logo Mail Archive

[tcpm] Proceeding CUBIC draft

Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 18 April 2022 05:03 UTC

Return-Path: <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649AE3A1EE5; Sun, 17 Apr 2022 22:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ko_NUhOL-tJK; Sun, 17 Apr 2022 22:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x329.google.com (mail-ot1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::329]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3179E3A1EDF; Sun, 17 Apr 2022 22:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x329.google.com with SMTP id 88-20020a9d0ee1000000b005d0ae4e126fso9220317otj.5; Sun, 17 Apr 2022 22:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MR4yoCGzWKmXkcOQKTZe08/LWU6ms1zG764AOugEhxw=; b=k31XGCB7fOUEtTtTy/RfHqq6qPJN8xtEdqaq5g/ItVA19NYzCmrX7w6BXZMdbMwX1V qXOQScTnGgSTYBywgE+I89TGX/tW9L1lGrjkdH0+E4mB/qxlKEfh1P605VJal/LkBIPF kGdF6DlS32hL9QO6SF9L+gE53FxBFcBf3ZtDcBzgHEp5SHBhkQR7+Wt7wXww/ANuXEyo koPrMkWlQCXW4G9OiMRTIMjkAaQJEMyP+UpZ3ybYZuhoZIoG9Yoe9lo0K7Jb0u86N7tv WGjqbR14yjyx0klwcFhyEUgW94TjVp4v1Fee4c7KpMAV7stvgcYWsnXXRcjwl0IHHhrg R/+A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MR4yoCGzWKmXkcOQKTZe08/LWU6ms1zG764AOugEhxw=; b=jVuWhp74DKx5tVsDtoVGXW1j/p/MZ/rEKdNUG73SzUOMG/24NZMUMkxBng76Xy3Abz 3mIukFch/1O9uUZGMFPp2OyXyz/IzUUEA8JRbkxC6+nUSu6ZEPqOaCCZaSBgC0tjlVoc +2P/gTMRioPK6pBqNbI5jfngi3rO8bp/XvwXRMkkSCdJMbr3zxxcDxODMLXTV+Kx3v1+ hvbhIxsoK83wmgGwHGB7T7hFFbXDMqzzRpDceZAhPFJEg1PLAH/s3ARSVVzW9Ct68IQz 3fcONYiPlywgU4t4yCTzgdy1OwNgdwCY7neMwAKde+7wkMxWDG4QD9fUkdmlVlbit+24 k3Kw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533jWa2EXJa9hAYv1ngFQr0oHpaaweINutGUZN/grE4ov+Pxk4k9 Kzdbs+L1cplrSZEI68xNxwG8lRLsF96tc/1/9sOeFXsY
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzfXheUM3Qc4OFWNC4mU+XMyBrr9ApdU9AxfzvEhVK8Vb00f/hzYnPqwrD5VbDQJQ2umppYl5khaLEmeeWlw8A=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:1b68:0:b0:5c9:5da1:3752 with SMTP id l95-20020a9d1b68000000b005c95da13752mr3341642otl.354.1650258227934; Sun, 17 Apr 2022 22:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 22:03:37 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAK044R12B3f+=2mR1ZK15Zkno5n0YvsjGy64LBiBgBN+9n71A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Cc: tcpm-chairs <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000076b98d05dce6afce"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/JVcxZNR8veuXz9GOymuewQ8ybCg>
Subject: [tcpm] Proceeding CUBIC draft
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 05:03:56 -0000

Hi folks,
I think we've seen a solid consensus to publish the CUBIC draft as a PS doc
during the last WG meeting. So, the chairs are thinking about proceeding in
this direction.

It seems to me that the remaining point of the draft is whether we add some
texts to the doc or publish it as it is. In my impression, it seems that
more people prefer to add some texts.

In case of adding some texts, we would like to understand what they will be.
Do we add the discussion points that Markku and Bob raised or we would like
to mention that CUBIC has been deployed without IETF process, or something
else?

We appreciate your feedback on this point or anything related to the doc
and the process.
--
Yoshi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email