Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-13.txt

Jakob Heitz <jakob.heitz@ericsson.com> Sat, 01 June 2013 17:38 UTC

Return-Path: <jakob.heitz@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D152121F9D39 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 10:38:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JCelAcob5shK for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 10:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usevmg20.ericsson.net (usevmg20.ericsson.net [198.24.6.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 732C321F9D51 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 10:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c618062d-b7f936d000004481-d4-51aa316e549b
Received: from EUSAAHC008.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.96]) by usevmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 9B.A3.17537.E613AA15; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 19:37:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUSAAMB109.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.126]) by EUSAAHC008.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.96]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 13:37:50 -0400
From: Jakob Heitz <jakob.heitz@ericsson.com>
To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
Thread-Topic: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-13.txt
Thread-Index: AQHOXi9R07IGxOen60eVrUN5k0w47JkhJqGAgAAwwwD//8m2Qw==
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 17:37:50 +0000
Message-ID: <67A4B8BE-96C7-4547-80B6-40CBB4B1DEA0@ericsson.com>
References: Your message of Fri, 31 May 2013 10:24:59 -0700. <51A8DCEB.2090401@isi.edu> <E1UiUMS-00074F-00@www.xplot.org> <012C3117EDDB3C4781FD802A8C27DD4F24BBF87A@SACEXCMBX02-PRD.hq.netapp.com>, <51AA26B8.7080700@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <51AA26B8.7080700@freebsd.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrNLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPgm6e4apAg097rCxubKi0eLLqDZvF yn9n2C0uNn9itNh2cj6Txbo/c1kc2Dz+vv/A5DHj03wWjyVLfjJ57H6/lQXI/cLm8eFQD3sA WxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxpWXm1gKdjNVLD1wlL2B8StjFyMnh4SAiUTP9o/MELaYxIV769m6 GLk4hASOMkos3nAcylnGKLFpxmVWkCo2AR2Jb9e7wDpEBNQljvyeyQJSxCxwkFFi24Nj7CAJ YQE7iZ2nmlkgiuwl9m67xgRhO0lcmNgJNohFQEXi75QrYDW8QDXruu+wQGx7yihxZOl+sCJO AW2J69/fgN3KCHTf91NrwAYxC4hL3HoynwnibgGJJXvOQ/0gKvHy8T9WiBodiQW7P7FB2NoS yxa+ZoZYJihxcuYTlgmMorOQjJqFpGUWkpZZSFoWMLKsYuQoLU4ty003MtjECIywYxJsujsY 97y0PMQozcGiJM6rxrs4UEggPbEkNTs1tSC1KL6oNCe1+BAjEwenVAOjZtBnngfndsZtadkc UdL0RtHz+GTOKyfc5pvJ3bCQ/nj+fsWHNd9P7I7rmc7x5G6LxsI/hf8WlDbPLN0iuOfeKZVD 2bsaos4aCPkd3esZ6JD6xItP4T+XYunWtX4TF3sedUqW0wpSS+fpLzkldeZE4bep9TFuGc0b jI1cZjc/+fdPgqlcZp6tEktxRqKhFnNRcSIAMFE9Tn4CAAA=
Cc: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>, "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>, Tim Shepard <shep@alum.mit.edu>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-13.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 17:38:05 -0000

On Jun 1, 2013, at 9:52 AM, "Andre Oppermann" <andre@freebsd.org> wrote:

> For a) a missing TSopt on a segment wouldn't be fatal, however which
> timestamp shall the receiver reflect from now on?  

Zero

> The last one seen?
> That would lead to a rapid inflation in apparent RTT seen on the sender.