[tcpm] Discussion on whether the TCP four-wave mechanism can be simplified to three-wave mechanism

"yangbuwangchuxin@163.com" <yangbuwangchuxin@163.com> Fri, 23 August 2024 00:21 UTC

Return-Path: <yangbuwangchuxin@163.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80036C14F75F for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 17:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ulhMXwX8NCZb for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 17:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from m16.mail.163.com (m16.mail.163.com [220.197.31.5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C4EC14F614 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 17:21:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=Date:From:Subject:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Message-ID; bh=ksFxqMhUWPofa4tIFbk0v37+hE61DgnYgr1DGTqXJqM=; b=N OebaERnrLiFzbeLeD9zl4ynhF6LNx9+vqau9ctJ64l3Nc6R4NdrZ8m29qXj7nUjX kH27l91G8jx6ezh3vxePxo2aotjuXqgUKQIGocYzioI4T2KyH5UkNyoAZeU7A0wH Jjex9cR/H6pI7ssp95S4iQTvQSJqy3UnJeqgVtyDeM=
Received: from yangbuwangchuxin$163.com ( [240e:479:9c10:37d8:e098:59ff:fe19:534c] ) by ajax-webmail-wzpm-k8s-gz (Coremail) ; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 08:21:36 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
X-Originating-IP: [240e:479:9c10:37d8:e098:59ff:fe19:534c]
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 08:21:36 +0800
From: "yangbuwangchuxin@163.com" <yangbuwangchuxin@163.com>
To: tcpm <tcpm@ietf.org>
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Coremail Webmail Server Version 2023.1-cmXT build 20230828(bca80109) MailAndroid/7.19.7_(14) Copyright (c) 2002-2024 www.mailtech.cn 163com
X-NTES-SC: AL_Qu2ZBv+cvUwi4CGdYukfm04Xjuc9WcK0u/si249eNpt4jATu6hwge0R/OUvx8vCLJCWPvSSrdhVi7cNaRbdcUJ0meQtCuv/TtWER3NZnmaX26Q==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_767592_789647055.1724372496163"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <6defaffd.3f8b1.1917c9c2f23.Coremail.yangbuwangchuxin@163.com>
X-Coremail-Locale: zh_CN
X-CM-TRANSID: _____wD3_7QR1sdm_asWAA--.40190W
X-CM-SenderInfo: p1dqwuxxzd0wxfkx5xrq6rljoofrz/1tbiXB1D7GXAnZHoSwACsm
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1U5529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7vcSsGvfC2KfnxnUU==
X-MailFrom: yangbuwangchuxin@163.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: nonmember-moderation
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tcpm.ietf.org-0
Message-ID-Hash: IQCGJFGJJY3EWMF4UA6GJ3CEDPV4VDWL
X-Message-ID-Hash: IQCGJFGJJY3EWMF4UA6GJ3CEDPV4VDWL
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 05:02:40 -0700
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [tcpm] Discussion on whether the TCP four-wave mechanism can be simplified to three-wave mechanism
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/KB4esnXRMSyp_oURCgmyfex8v5c>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tcpm-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tcpm-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tcpm-leave@ietf.org>

IEFT Hello, I am a Chinese computer major student, I have an idea is to study the TCP four wave mechanism, if one party still has data to pass, continue to open the connection. However, if both parties have no more data to transmit at a given moment, can it be possible to dispense with one wave, thus turning four waves into three? (Go straight back to the finally state at the end of the third time.) For example, is it feasible to go directly to the last step, that is, to change from the original four waves to three waves? Is there a theoretical basis for this assumption and the possibility of practical application?
 
Thank you, looking forward to reply!
 
I wish all the best!
Yang Zhiyuan
August 23, 2024