[tcpm] TCP MSS clamping to try to deal with MTU issues in Dual-Stack Lite

Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Fri, 27 March 2009 17:14 UTC

Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77703A6968; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.028, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yab3WM+ikTnj; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (mailgw4.ericsson.se [193.180.251.62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D9C3A6C3F; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 1A50B201E4; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:15:49 +0100 (CET)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3e-af7bcbb000006d6d-8f-49cd09c446dd
Received: from esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se (unknown [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id E854820089; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:15:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.175]) by esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:15:48 +0100
Received: from [153.88.49.36] ([153.88.49.36]) by esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:15:47 +0100
Message-ID: <49CD09C2.40806@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:15:46 -0700
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: softwires@ietf.org, tcpm@ietf.org
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Mar 2009 17:15:48.0342 (UTC) FILETIME=[AC106960:01C9AEFF]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: [tcpm] TCP MSS clamping to try to deal with MTU issues in Dual-Stack Lite
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:14:57 -0000

Hi,

There is a proposal to use TCP MSS clamping to deal with MTU issues that
comes from Dual-stack lite's tunnel encapsulation.

I think it would be good if TCPM could provide some feedback on this
proposal.

The relevant document and section:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-softwire-dual-stack-lite-00

7.4. MTU


   Using an encapsulation (IP in IP or L2TP) to carry IPv4 traffic over
   IPv6 will reduce the effective MTU of the datagrams.  Unfortunately,
   path MTU discovery is not a reliable method to deal with this.  As
   such a combination of solutions is suggested:

   o  For TCP traffic, let the carrier-grade NAT rewrite the MSS in the
      first SYN packet to a lower value.

   o  For non-TCP traffic, perform fragmentation and reassembly over the
      tunnel between the home gateway and the carrier grade NAT.  In
      practice, this means put the IPv4 packet into a large IPv6 packet
      and fragment/reassemble the IPv6 packet at each endpoint of the
      tunnel.  There is a performance price to pay for this.
      Fragmentation is not very expensive, but reassembly can be,
      especially on the carrier-grade NAT that would have to keep track
      of a lot of flows.  However, such a carrier-grade NAT would only
      have to perform reassembly for large UDP packets sourced by
      customers, not for large UDP packets received by customers.  In
      other words, streaming video to a customer would not have a
      significant impact on the performance of the carrier-grade NAT,
      but will require more work on the home gateway side.

Cheers

Magnus Westerlund

IETF Transport Area Director & TSVWG Chair
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------