Re: [tcpm] Introduce RFC 6937 bis (Proportional Rate Reduction) as a tcpm work item? INPUT NEEDED
"Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs.ietf@gmx.at> Thu, 19 November 2020 07:42 UTC
Return-Path: <rs.ietf@gmx.at>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE223A111F for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 23:42:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sur3fzOxAghc for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 23:42:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FB3E3A0D42 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 23:42:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1605771771; bh=+lyjkry4QfMVaJtHtnCyek/aFITTzYAZw3Fj3dZVJBQ=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=hca4tINIkYRhvqgC0zCE/uqy/cOPR8DvXi78egzesswUl5JPyEKvXwUyZIY/mcwG4 i33wPDlmlgtRmLgBKR+3cPTQPAW5wrUMB0Zo1V6ekDVZNvpg/vywJ9oXUzFF+mjDws UGOj1HFR71xJDERaexH00TrrjyPsTywKp12vaEiY=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.233.106] ([185.236.167.136]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MqaxO-1jtNOd00Rc-00mXHT for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 08:42:51 +0100
To: tcpm@ietf.org
References: <CAH56bmCkmtvqTRaEC-AFd-_W1nWeE0JE9SMt=w8E5JoHvvnVtQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs.ietf@gmx.at>
Message-ID: <ba17cdbf-e58f-6b35-0bd6-7c9a86089913@gmx.at>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 08:42:50 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAH56bmCkmtvqTRaEC-AFd-_W1nWeE0JE9SMt=w8E5JoHvvnVtQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:L94J8w3bLn9tISf2pc405iOs7ZCxfE3MHJ7FyfO2JL5Xh9Z/nIq Is+Foz80H20sIhLnPUsh96QN5GGt+hPHQsiiJ2nXboKCX1a6rxHIlE7xMHGsCVUS6DezBTH N6lLQqZ+aYL8j5dTOdrgjswNFvui8/7wTTQZQGbfXV4ETVetxxgFHGUdwxX09iueNMXG9X+ jPgRYktQbK/MoFFrqAfIw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:87K4mSLV4EQ=:wXuBjRnXNps53b85/DhV8B 4sR3aEtd5pwEkLMH5JsJ156wjo6kYf0+Pbzvd9esDDtvqZ4eNdoz/3KzeW1O5pRkbx67rDVoF 33ozt8WUPe09x8yvIx13JNOaPp/7/132WUQbj71p256RX21v2O6EDqs3g7hEsIxB9hl645HJR Ci1NopKPIHL8xuLH8LHPDWWTCwvDFegX3oqYYPdxQkFEB+MmwY5t6DgE63hI33m4RDiDTrv33 MoO8Z1CbQ0vifI9Cf8oxwkDwXoIH031M+Mx1F8fA6+MlZXgq0XkRB7nnsdU3xbZFGrh/fUZWN nBnDd2AWRW/OIJNqFwiMFelwgtjzIOnf7U7AyXTjGOjz7zWLgOCoVRIPRRIQUH7tfYfBN+sx7 p9MSaHLxH0sKz/zFQZwPYHsY3VLKeXPkbMp9xGoWk3uvTHJ8IKzPl50ATbA0BMMtH9KDQh9dg hB87/9LBTYWyP4AzSTgMP09OOH3pROoLnG4ssY7PmYMuQrhdO4vX0a9a/ZCmYWHXML1A1ryZ7 sOZUyoZN8vvqBq4Sf3j7CWJxIglnkznYXXSromWKrcPxU/k8ziyFkAoJCb5/pjyM5ODq2soru 4eAe087F/on/3JJF1Hz+G+etU1kdGy9XFgSYGsWnt6uFvddt0b3NuaaZPlw1KPlombybpz1yy H/o6o2kHiGkR169pJKbz2fR3bTRNiogcEsaJOEKwlkoVIuAlxRfSLbnnlTkK0+Zkdqm4g7IZA CZUaaX9UjS6LANwYX76tbpTF2SdCgxl3SuY/69JTVb4tKgmFeCXT28Ve0XwI71L5hh/nXmlEX +1uavSNVOjkKmxq/P8ODRDjreB+a/sgYbZDBUnPvxXCDfIJBOi9Zdu7RXUoDG2Oj6z8tEE8h0 pH216997cShkGIE5TTqw==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/KTk9Xl29IYS_p2LBdaDhQO1dwuo>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Introduce RFC 6937 bis (Proportional Rate Reduction) as a tcpm work item? INPUT NEEDED
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 07:42:57 -0000
As the heuristic is the one major improvement over RFC6937, that is the one area I am especially interested in. Currently working to have PRR in FreeBSD, it would be the best time window to add this heuristig instead of switching between the two variants in a static fashion. I support this and will certainly be reviewing the documents and provide feedback! Richard Am 19.11.2020 um 04:56 schrieb Matt Mathis: > The authors of PRR would like to update PRR to Proposed Standard > status. This entails introducing a new document as an tcpm work item. > > *Please indicate (non) support and/or comment.* > > For more details see the tcpm meeting materials from IETF 109 > minutes: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/109/materials/minutes-109-tcpm-00 > slides: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mathis-tcpm-rfc6937bis-00 > > There were about four "I support this work" remarks at the mic (not > recorded in the minutes), and about as many in the Meetecho chat. > > Abridged IETF/tcpm/PRRbis slides: > -- > PRR recap (RFC6937 experimental) > PRR is a special congestion control effective only during fast recovery > > * When inflight >= ssthresh, send at loss_beta*rate_before_loss (e.g. > loss_beta = 0.5 for Reno (aka rate-halving), 0.7 for Cubic) > * When inflight < ssthresh, send at the same or twice the > delivery_rate (more later) > * Used by all congestion control modules in Linux during fast recovery > o Can be more dominant than the actual C.C. for lossy flows > that’re in fast recovery constantly (e.g. video streaming > through policers) > > -- > Current Status > > * > > PRR is widely deployed > > o > > At least three major OSs: Linux, Windows, (NetFlix) BSD > > o > > Vast majority of Web traffic for years > > * > > No changes to algorithms published in RFC 6937 > > o > > PRR-CRB - Conservative Reduction Bound - strict packet > conversion during loss recovery > > o > > PRR-SSRB - Slowstart Reduction Bound - one extra segment per ACK > during loss recovery > > * > > 2015 Heuristic to dynamically select which reduction bound > > o > > Only use PRR-SSRB when making good forward progress > > + > > ACKs that advanced snd.una and report no new losses > > o > > Resolves some pathological cases with token bucket policers > > + > > CC estimates ssthresh before it can possibly measure the > token rate > > + > > The heuristic makes the best of a bad situation > > -- > Tentative path forward > > * > > Adopt as a tcpm work item > > * > > Update the text > > o > > Normative RFC 2119 language > > o > > Add MAY use the heuristic... > > o > > Trim redundant and obsolete language > > + > > RFC 6937 repeats itself and is much longer than necessary > > + > > Focus on what an implementer needs to know > > + > > Use non-normative references to RFC 6937 for prior > measurement work, etc > > Thanks, > --MM-- > The best way to predict the future is to create it. - Alan Kay > > We must not tolerate intolerance; > however our response must be carefully measured: > too strong would be hypocritical and risks spiraling out of > control; > too weak risks being mistaken for tacit approval. > > _______________________________________________ > tcpm mailing list > tcpm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm >
- [tcpm] Introduce RFC 6937 bis (Proportional Rate … Matt Mathis
- Re: [tcpm] Introduce RFC 6937 bis (Proportional R… Scheffenegger, Richard
- Re: [tcpm] Introduce RFC 6937 bis (Proportional R… Ian Swett
- Re: [tcpm] Introduce RFC 6937 bis (Proportional R… Scharf, Michael
- Re: [tcpm] Introduce RFC 6937 bis (Proportional R… Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [tcpm] Introduce RFC 6937 bis (Proportional R… Matt Mathis
- Re: [tcpm] [EXTERNAL] Re: Introduce RFC 6937 bis … Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [tcpm] [EXTERNAL] Re: Introduce RFC 6937 bis … Neal Cardwell
- Re: [tcpm] [EXTERNAL] Re: Introduce RFC 6937 bis … Yuchung Cheng
- [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG Adoption of RFC… Yoshifumi Nishida
- Re: [tcpm] [EXTERNAL] Re: Introduce RFC 6937 bis … Martin Duke
- Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG Adoption of… Yoshifumi Nishida
- Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG Adoption of… Yoshifumi Nishida
- Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG Adoption of… Scheffenegger, Richard
- Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG Adoption of… Scheffenegger, Richard