[tcpm] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-14: (with COMMENT)

Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 17 December 2020 07:53 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-tcpm-rack@ietf.org, tcpm-chairs@ietf.org, tcpm@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tcpm-rack.all@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <160819163601.18444.15133884751875574217@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 23:53:56 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/KbqZNGXz42c-s-k5zGKmkhoAelE>
Subject: [tcpm] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-14: (with COMMENT)

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-14: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-rack/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for this work.  It's interesting stuff!

Please expand DUPACK on first use.

Section 2 is curious.  As I read it, it establishes a normative recommendation
to use it, but doesn't update either of its antecedents (RFC 5681 or RFC 6675)
such that someone reading those might be referred to this.

[tcpm] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-i… Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
Re: [tcpm] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on dra… Yuchung Cheng