Re: [tcpm] WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-hystartplusplus-04

Hello,
As an individual participant,  I think the draft is mostly ready, but I
have the following comments.

1: Section 4.2:
    according to the pseudo code, rttSampleCount can exceed N_RTT_SAMPLE.
    So, I personally prefer to update the following sentences to mention
this point more explicitly like:
   "For rounds where N_RTT_SAMPLE RTT samples have been obtained and
currentRoundMinRTT and lastRoundMinRTT are valid"
          ->
   "For rounds where at least N_RTT_SAMPLE RTT samples have been
obtained..."

   "For CSS rounds where N_RTT_SAMPLE RTT samples have been obtained.."
          ->
   "For CSS rounds where at least N_RTT_SAMPLE RTT samples have been
obtained.."

2: Section 5:
    "Hystart++ reduces byte retransmitted by 50% and retransmission
timeouts by 36%."
    "In an A/B test for Hystart++ draft.."

     It's not very clear what was compared with hystart++ here. Is it
conventional slow-start or hystart?
     If it's hystart, it seems to me that reducing retransmission and
retransmission timeout is a bit counter-intuitive as hystart++ can gain
higher throughput than hystart in my understanding.
     If it's conventional slow-start, the presentation of the results is a
bit weak as the motivation of hystart++ is to improve hystart.

Thanks,
--
Yoshi

On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 1:19 PM Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> this e-mail starts the working group last call for
> draft-ietf-tcpm-hystartplusplus-04.
>
> The WGLC runs until Friday, May 6th 2022.
>
> Please send any comments, including indications to support this document,
> to the TCMP mailing list by then.
>
> The ID is available at
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-hystartplusplus-04.html
>
> Best regards
> Michael
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
>