Re: [tcpm] New Version Notification for draft-touch-tcpm-tcp-edo-01.txt

Olivier Bonaventure <Olivier.Bonaventure@uclouvain.be> Fri, 30 May 2014 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <olivier.bonaventure@uclouvain.be>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05C01A6FB7 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 May 2014 10:42:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id waXUnZIrIsHx for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 May 2014 10:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp6.sgsi.ucl.ac.be (smtp.sgsi.ucl.ac.be [130.104.5.67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39AB71A6FB6 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 May 2014 10:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mbpobo.local (host-212-68-230-69.brutele.be [212.68.230.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: obonaventure@smtp6.sgsi.ucl.ac.be) by smtp6.sgsi.ucl.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6DD88183444; Fri, 30 May 2014 19:42:22 +0200 (CEST)
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp6.sgsi.ucl.ac.be 6DD88183444
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=uclouvain.be; s=selucl; t=1401471742; bh=VPrxm8iNIIO0vjrFdQoWhQLOlQHQArPTI2doyjDRxxY=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=J3L/j7uuZAi5JmUyBQJp0k80BxQHfqINaLVqi6fE1x+OnhxJKgc7r0hAnS16z20o5 wBKGYxjKYOdUz/LqqVZ5ocVKyK+z88AHMEa1L+95NFhHpur8+nwvEZWMboBLJp7W1W n5VXkY6mLMADyxJTnD3XR43mV9reSDV+eDvnwGCo=
Message-ID: <5388C2FE.9060105@uclouvain.be>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 19:42:22 +0200
From: Olivier Bonaventure <Olivier.Bonaventure@uclouvain.be>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bob Briscoe <bob.briscoe@bt.com>
References: <20140425221257.12559.43206.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <2586_1398464386_535ADF82_2586_915_1_535ADF56.9050106@isi.edu> <CF8D8E25-E435-4199-8FD6-3F7066447292@iki.fi> <5363AF84.8090701@mti-systems.com> <5363B397.8090009@isi.edu> <CAO249yeyr5q21-=e6p5azwULOh1_jUsniZ6YPcDYd69av8MMYw@mail.gmail.com> <DCC98F94-EA74-4AAA-94AE-E399A405AF13@isi.edu> <655C07320163294895BBADA28372AF5D2CFE36@FR712WXCHMBA15.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <20140503122950.GM44329@verdi> <655C07320163294895BBADA28372AF5D2D009E@FR712WXCHMBA15.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <201405221710.s4MHAY4S002037@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <201405221710.s4MHAY4S002037@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.7-exp at smtp-6.sipr-dc.ucl.ac.be
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Sgsi-Spamcheck: SASL authenticated,
X-SGSI-MailScanner-ID: 6DD88183444.A009D
X-SGSI-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-SGSI-From: olivier.bonaventure@uclouvain.be
X-SGSI-Spam-Status: No
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/L7gMtGR9A-HuRlqe1s0pTD5RnV8
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] New Version Notification for draft-touch-tcpm-tcp-edo-01.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Olivier.Bonaventure@uclouvain.be
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 17:42:33 -0000

Bob,
>
> Returning to the question of adoption, we have to address the question
> of why previous attempts to do this have failed. I don't believe it is
> as simple as that they tried to include options on SYNs, so all we have
> to do is avoid the SYN problem.
...
>
> 4) Finally, the EDO draft cites <draft-ananth-tcpm-tcpoptext-00> as if
> it is just another solution. It's not. It's actually a very useful
> survey of all the previous attempts to solve this problem, including a
> useful enumeration of the problems that have to be surmounted.
>
> The arguments on this thread show that we don't agree on the problem
> space. So, I suggest we adopt Anatha's draft, and as we develop it, we
> agree on the problem we are trying to solve first. Boring, but
> apparently necessary.


I was offline this week and am now catching up the email thread. I agree 
that starting from this draft would be an excellent idea to document in 
an information draft the existing solutions and their advantages and 
drawbacks. With this documentation, we could then build another solution 
that works efficiently.


Olivier