Re: [tcpm] another review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure[-10]

"Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)" <ananth@cisco.com> Thu, 02 October 2008 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tcpm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC153A6ABA; Thu, 2 Oct 2008 10:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DFA43A697A for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Oct 2008 10:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.418
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.418 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.181, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rpx0Jqje5748 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Oct 2008 10:51:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7316B3A69DA for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Oct 2008 10:51:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,352,1220227200"; d="scan'208";a="167516436"
Received: from sj-dkim-1.cisco.com ([171.71.179.21]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Oct 2008 17:52:05 +0000
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m92Hq5sP018181; Thu, 2 Oct 2008 10:52:05 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-231.cisco.com [128.107.191.100]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m92Hq54O015698; Thu, 2 Oct 2008 17:52:05 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.176]) by xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 2 Oct 2008 10:52:05 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 10:52:04 -0700
Message-ID: <0C53DCFB700D144284A584F54711EC5805E5BB5E@xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <48E502A1.5060006@isi.edu>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [tcpm] another review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure[-10]
Thread-Index: Ackksx6V++O+HJhNSw+kWz8E7b9bEwAAKIog
References: <986B5B70-4BD5-46EF-943C-DE588603CF6C@windriver.com> <13D1EAB852BE194C94773A947138483D061CA91D@xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com> <20081002001625.GQ60793@zod.isi.edu> <0A1AC67E-26EE-4553-92FA-7FDC46685B37@nokia.com> <48E502A1.5060006@isi.edu>
From: "Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)" <ananth@cisco.com>
To: "Joe Touch" <touch@ISI.EDU>, "Lars Eggert" <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Oct 2008 17:52:05.0112 (UTC) FILETIME=[94D12780:01C924B7]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=424; t=1222969925; x=1223833925; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1004; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=ananth@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Anantha=20Ramaiah=20(ananth)=22=20<ananth@cisco .com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[tcpm]=20another=20review=20of=20draft- ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure[-10] |Sender:=20; bh=kEYnW3qa1lKIfdEONUh7fe/2oMXxS1LIywjmfZpal2g=; b=qNJ95//NhRCo/xrKTmNU93Y41//tWn3ObJq0JRmsthLFJY5ylt6r3gtUNY +fj+pyuiSa04Gnea9JzLbKtL+TYBBkGRrDvxNP+8IQuSzdTHRbQJluax3Pgq YOD23430RTIQ2j0y8bqSaXTPXgHRzYb+tzq9fwx58tDEQoVOCE2NU=;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=ananth@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; );
Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Alfred_H=CEnes?= <ah@tr-sys.de>, tcpm@ietf.org, David Borman <david.borman@windriver.com>, ext Ted Faber <faber@ISI.EDU>, Randy Stewart <randall@lakerest.net>, "Mitesh Dalal \(mdalal\)" <mdalal@cisco.com>, "Eddy, Wesley M. \(GRC-RCN0\)\[VZ\]" <Wesley.M.Eddy@nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] another review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure[-10]
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

 
> Given the 
> complexity of that document, this label isn't going to help, 
> and IMO will misdirect implementers to include this where it 
> wasn't necessary.

We have already addressed the "mis-direction" case, by adding the qualifiers (SHOULD, MAY etc.,) and more importantly the applicability statement. Actually not adding "updates" would mis-direct the implementers, IMO.

-Anantha

 
_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm