Re: [tcpm] WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-10

Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com> Mon, 21 September 2020 16:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ycheng@google.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375913A044E for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YTnsakLLHTv3 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:54:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe32.google.com (mail-vs1-xe32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BAC53A041B for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:54:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe32.google.com with SMTP id e14so8526523vsa.9 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qG08qwZ5SPxuwXVlcpY7r5YYDATCUWz+TR99+wnVxRU=; b=QIbNhCv33OAlFUjdTyKBY4G9OzbJDtnV0b/RMU62yvNzCV143adEOM9iPB9YP4FOaJ bi2ly7ac8fM04Cd16MC5CRIGrzcv4BcThgG1F1QyrzUVpZo3qfwzYo6ABdb/qyjuL0q9 Hx60hqh9rUJwW+JO2h1Hq5Y4aGK/WRwNd3FTTNhy27oSkVzKSaZwiG21h08IkKdua2dg KkdV6oD9clXrpzAt4u6m4zp3Ukf3flIBj2Phlhzbyw4P/63vYuslGqas43Bf4u/xhRfR PX07Qrjd4oaTzn3Vw3XPiCdjDSJsRHHrH0eZYpAhZBymeHXC2ivFN/gHueXliYxYeJo+ TPQw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qG08qwZ5SPxuwXVlcpY7r5YYDATCUWz+TR99+wnVxRU=; b=r7F9ShrWWQXCkFgaguHds2bK22Rfz7PMEZofVUQF8IJs+ZkeiDEyqJFVs58WvLm30b gRsHhLIfgywd16RaO0zM1J03ztiqButv6qPsnQCtwCDkDcbD5edC5bIKJlKgxiCbWocb 7Gw365wrb4zxM2LKCMSOKB9s0Vsrb1ZZQTv07uMhzC2n81uOGvo4bOpq1ArobEYWxFzY ILRQMfVl/jINE0ARSRVmj10Evs8w/jQQ1/wFKk7MRPoEED0wZP8Jz7+qKW8EY+NF7IQj 2DcHthakPAwjkiw6G9qNbUimEszfy9rG9q1zHBjAVjGzC+Q2r3aBaZghbpXPEGxUi5n2 kiIA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533QldG/qh6B+QDavlfHEStecwpK9CuT74x+LHzfgi2eifp6MaGI PtI8keihcld0K3fUmkiQ/aAu9f6ypLYSHSJmMMyKzQ+VXIU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwKlKB5T5Ke6ZgcDdFWHivWDCUA1E4Cuzx0HG32nAQv8KgE+9NKWMOrl2idYW+kegh81Lt0a1ttKZ7UeA0vFjk=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:2261:: with SMTP id v1mr799025vsd.28.1600707265851; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <6BFDF7F3-71F0-4544-9F6D-7BE4CD108B51@fh-muenster.de> <befcf6fc-9a07-0c12-d445-cb970b93d349@tenghardt.net>
In-Reply-To: <befcf6fc-9a07-0c12-d445-cb970b93d349@tenghardt.net>
From: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:53:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CAK6E8=cVgU9Jbb4WY5=wZhgp4c18NQZKjNRza8V8_4Kba8wY0Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Theresa Enghardt <ietf@tenghardt.net>
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f8cee105afd5b309"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/LotEdaOVNruWnmOniubTY4ldUuw>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-10
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 16:54:29 -0000

On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 8:43 PM Theresa Enghardt <ietf@tenghardt.net> wrote:

> Dear TCPM,
>
> I just re-read draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-10 (after having provided feedback to
> -09).
>
> The draft has improved substantially and all my comments were addressed.
>
> So I'm in favor of publishing this document.
>
> One small thing I still found:
>
> In Section 7.4.2, the pseudocode uses a variable called ACK.seq. Is this
> the same as SEG.ACK in the same pseudocode? I think it should be an
> acknowledgement number, not the sequence number of the received ACK.
>
Thanks for catching that typo. for clarity will replace both ACK.seq &
SEQ.ack to
the ACK's acknowledgement number


>
> And small editorial nit:
>
> In Section 2.2, the numbered list has two items of "1."
>
wil fix in -11

>
> Best,
> Theresa
>
>
> On 10.09.20 00:50, Michael Tuexen wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> this e-mail starts the working group last call for draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-10.
>
> The WGLC runs until Tuesday, September 20th 2020.
>
> It is the 2nd WGLC on RACK, since the document improved substantially based
> on the feedback given during the 1st WGLC.
>
> Please send any comments, including indications to support this document,
> to the TCMP mailing list by then.
>
> The ID is available athttps://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-10
>
> Best regards
> Michael
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing listtcpm@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
>