Re: [tcpm] WGLC: draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-02.txt

[David Borman <[e-mail]>]

Fernando,

On Mar 2, 2010, at 4:01 PM, Fernando Gont wrote:

> Hi, David,
> 
> Thanks so much for pushing this forward!
> 
> Comments inline...
> 
>> WG chair hat off: ----------------- I just realized that: 1) The
>> document should have at the top: Updates: RFCs 793, 1011, 1122 
> 
> Will ask on the xml2rfc list what's the xml code to do that. If anybody
> knows, please do let me know.
> 
> 
>> 2) The
>> "1. Introduction" section should say that it updates all 3 RFCs, not
>> just RFC 1122. 
> 
> Will do.
> 
> 
>> 3) The Normative References should include RFC 1011. 
> 
> Will do.
> 
> 
>> 4) The "4. Updating RFC 1122" section should also mention all 3 RFCs,
>> not just RFC 1122
> 
> Will do.
> 
> 
> 
>> The other RFCs that talk about the urgent pointer, 924, 944, 961 and
>> 991, are all obsoleted by RFC 1011, hence only RFC 1011 needs to be
>> mentioned.
> 
> Ok. Will go through the draft and try to replace references to the
> aforementioned RFCs with references to RFC 1101.

For most of the document I think it is fine to just reference RFC 1122, since that was the last attempt to clarify the situation.  As long as the Updates:, Intro and the explicit "Updating RFC 1122" section mention all 3, that should be sufficient from my viewpoint.

> If you agree, I can post a rev in the next few days, so that we ship the
> I-D with all these tihngs fixes (plus the nit John Heffner has just
> pointed out).

That'd be great.  So if anyone else has any final comments, get them in now!

			-David Borman