Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-28.txt

Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Mon, 07 March 2022 19:21 UTC

Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8FCC3A129F for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 11:21:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mti-systems-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m8HqVxyFUHGs for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 11:21:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x829.google.com (mail-qt1-x829.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::829]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D66373A12A3 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 11:21:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x829.google.com with SMTP id v3so14125000qta.11 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Mar 2022 11:21:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mti-systems-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YxMs9Np3MMW+f0HoQEzUhcvdNnuoaqXoKnxcdmekCoo=; b=Gm79tp1Ym4BbViCXM/3UQ78ToYSK+LcDpuM1KwzlqvXSqwc+L3fmmrigNHtE0blyfT 1G/ErGEKDFWeBDbf/6d0OAmLOxWhLczufDBrqXAwnr86qHtAbBVJUgkf8kcd6M4F0zOf ST66iQ9yzlbpHSDQC57PvT57B3sG5HdBed5M9VQSX7VNVaLHb7v9HAGtxvisMxyzbOnD SQwKIAXfHsAWM5thA81WybwFP5T7gCMuCxSJk4vTRlkUj4Xm+BugZDMZWESyApQgDnur DCSN/2jbh4AMnuDjRAfg92ReCWuoJjpG8XIwk29R463+hE/x2ZyTtHEMa5MsgTvw2u7R 7hng==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=YxMs9Np3MMW+f0HoQEzUhcvdNnuoaqXoKnxcdmekCoo=; b=UOCTAWRGw+btvsd3HFdhUAqIdUW4CPj0DCqxLkSGazD74n/FYBHW0kULrIlnfs1QzK zj4xkQWp08gZlRFh7GHzrKwAKkQxlkFaSqmPWi4LWY81I1rxBmLMSyj4KtbR6xh1Vbsc SF3lblSX5vmXVQjxtAiXgRBk+AgL0bsHogeIscA2GWe5/SIGYG/WgTWxsxc2koyBRtrH M1hqHvYWqugY2ID61KMGKFmTPSf913B5TvGFPx/GZuWjaq6brTSYvGyHLQfcEGk2JB45 LT1Zk7Fsgcvw8OhQ1+ZXSwcS6THab72w2EA4o7o8wJWLxCOC77FxDnVgxrLqKSaj20Sm rWbg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533M9nMJZK9/+RTWTC5b5MDNWu120EcVRokOhil3uTiMmrECmxED KVb27e/obF1x4/lS3CTATiXcNrLTuCqufQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwkrmrnsKH4A77Q+T29gfHM5Z/bIVhAXnA2v/WbnaF+b39uMsEEHZiZ0nrFWMu2dxqssjQvCg==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5b4d:0:b0:2e0:5fd5:8c9c with SMTP id n13-20020ac85b4d000000b002e05fd58c9cmr8780034qtw.338.1646680862004; Mon, 07 Mar 2022 11:21:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.114] (069-135-001-122.biz.spectrum.com. [69.135.1.122]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j20-20020a37a014000000b0067b3a0c7d89sm958543qke.38.2022.03.07.11.21.01 for <tcpm@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Mar 2022 11:21:01 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <3788ea65-bbb0-0e3e-ae12-22ebe207cbca@mti-systems.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 14:20:59 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.2
Content-Language: en-US
To: tcpm@ietf.org
References: <164667773454.9415.2373504566439641936@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
In-Reply-To: <164667773454.9415.2373504566439641936@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/MJR9PE1sBw6S3gJnj0DNTozWX14>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-28.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 19:21:09 -0000

I think this update reflects all of the IESG discussion so far, with the 
exception of the 1 remaining DISCUSS point related to ISN randomization.


On 3/7/2022 1:28 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions WG of the IETF.
>
>          Title           : Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) Specification
>          Author          : Wesley M. Eddy
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-28.txt
> 	Pages           : 114
> 	Date            : 2022-03-07
>
> Abstract:
>     This document specifies the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP).  TCP
>     is an important transport layer protocol in the Internet protocol
>     stack, and has continuously evolved over decades of use and growth of
>     the Internet.  Over this time, a number of changes have been made to
>     TCP as it was specified in RFC 793, though these have only been
>     documented in a piecemeal fashion.  This document collects and brings
>     those changes together with the protocol specification from RFC 793.
>     This document obsoletes RFC 793, as well as RFCs 879, 2873, 6093,
>     6429, 6528, and 6691 that updated parts of RFC 793.  It updates RFCs
>     1011 and 1122, and should be considered as a replacement for the
>     portions of those document dealing with TCP requirements.  It also
>     updates RFC 5961 by adding a small clarification in reset handling
>     while in the SYN-RECEIVED state.  The TCP header control bits from
>     RFC 793 have also been updated based on RFC 3168.
>
>     RFC EDITOR NOTE: If approved for publication as an RFC, this should
>     be marked additionally as "STD: 7" and replace RFC 793 in that role.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis/
>
> There is also an htmlized version available at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-28
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-28
>
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm