IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Summary of responses so far and proposal movingforward[WasRe:[tcpm] Is this a problem?]

weddy@grc.nasa.gov Tue, 27 November 2007 15:06 UTC

Return-path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ix20m-0004p8-3x; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:06:08 -0500
Received: from tcpm by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ix20j-0004oM-Gu for tcpm-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:06:05 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ix20g-0004nT-F1 for tcpm@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:06:02 -0500
Received: from mx1.grc.nasa.gov ([128.156.11.68]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ix20g-0003lx-5s for tcpm@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:06:02 -0500
Received: from lombok-fi.grc.nasa.gov (seraph.grc.nasa.gov [128.156.10.10]) by mx1.grc.nasa.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 831F3C22D for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:06:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from apataki.grc.nasa.gov (apataki.grc.nasa.gov [139.88.112.35]) by lombok-fi.grc.nasa.gov (NASA GRC TCPD 8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id lARF61Oc027710; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:06:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by apataki.grc.nasa.gov (NASA GRC TCPD 8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id lARF60H8029216; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:06:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from apataki.grc.nasa.gov ([127.0.0.1])by localhost (apataki.grc.nasa.gov [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)with ESMTP id LYYDJEkwo37Y; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:06:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from drpepper.grc.nasa.gov (gr2134391.grc.nasa.gov [139.88.44.123])by apataki.grc.nasa.gov (NASA GRC TCPD 8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id lARF5uum029206;Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:05:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: by drpepper.grc.nasa.gov (Postfix, from userid 501)id 75FC514052; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:04:44 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:04:44 -0500
From: weddy@grc.nasa.gov
To: David Borman <david.borman@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: Summary of responses so far and proposal movingforward[WasRe:[tcpm] Is this a problem?]
Message-ID: <20071127150444.GD19701@grc.nasa.gov>
References: <20071126193803.585E12FC5BE@lawyers.icir.org> <61806008-0CBC-417D-B5EB-46A7EE18446F@windriver.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <61806008-0CBC-417D-B5EB-46A7EE18446F@windriver.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
X-imss-version: 2.046
X-imss-result: Passed
X-imss-scores: Clean:99.90000 C:2 M:3 S:5 R:5
X-imss-settings: Baseline:1 C:1 M:1 S:1 R:1 (0.0000 0.0000)
X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++)
X-Scan-Signature: 7aefe408d50e9c7c47615841cb314bed
Cc: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions WG <tcpm@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: weddy@grc.nasa.gov
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 08:58:40AM -0600, David Borman wrote:
>
> While I agree with the document on the identification of the problem, I 
> disagree with the proposed solution (changing TCP to time out connections 
> in persist state).

I'm in harmony with this and everything else Dave said.


_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status