IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] poll for adoption of draft-ananth-persist-02

"Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]" <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov> Wed, 14 April 2010 15:36 UTC

Return-Path: <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F1F3A6973 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 08:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fbK0qkJC7FMi for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 08:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndjsnpf03.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjsnpf03.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.123]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 374023A68B9 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 08:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndjsppt04.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjsppt04.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.103]) by ndjsnpf03.ndc.nasa.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB992D8535; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:36:32 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ndjshub06.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjshub06.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.4.165]) by ndjsppt04.ndc.nasa.gov (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o3EFaVxY001637; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:36:31 -0500
Received: from NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.4.166]) by ndjshub06.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.4.165]) with mapi; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:36:31 -0500
From: "Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]" <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>
To: "Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)" <ananth@cisco.com>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:36:30 -0500
Thread-Topic: [tcpm] poll for adoption of draft-ananth-persist-02
Thread-Index: Acq++HhKPa/WNfamRcGprqSmMXJeBgc3B4fwAARMR6AAAILj8A==
Message-ID: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB47E12D0F7E@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
References: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB47DF997794@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov> <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB47E1253387@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov> <0C53DCFB700D144284A584F54711EC5809605EAA@xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <0C53DCFB700D144284A584F54711EC5809605EAA@xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5, 1.2.40, 4.0.166 definitions=2010-04-14_12:2010-02-06, 2010-04-14, 2010-04-14 signatures=0
Subject: Re: [tcpm] poll for adoption of draft-ananth-persist-02
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:36:39 -0000

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Anantha Ramaiah (ananth) [mailto:ananth@cisco.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:32 AM
>To: Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]; tcpm@ietf.org
>Subject: RE: [tcpm] poll for adoption of draft-ananth-persist-02
>
>Wes,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tcpm-bounces@ietf.org] On
>> Behalf Of Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 6:22 AM
>> To: tcpm@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [tcpm] poll for adoption of draft-ananth-persist-02
>>
>> After reviewing this mailing list thread and the IETF 77
>> discussion, David and I think there's support to make this a
>> working group document.
>>
>> As we see it, the path to take toward publication is:
>>
>> 1) authors submit a draft-ietf-tcpm version of the document
>
>Should we re-submit the draft-ietf version taking into incorporating all
>the comments we have received so far + new boiler plate etc.,?
>


Yes, and in the meantime, keep the discussion open on the
socket option.  If it converges in time for the resolution
to be included in the updated WG document, that would be
good, but not strictly necessary.  We would like to come
to consensus on that before making a WGLC though.

--
Wes Eddy
MTI Systems

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email