Re: [tcpm] Faster application handshakes with SYN/ACK payloads

"Adam Langley" <agl@imperialviolet.org> Fri, 01 August 2008 01:05 UTC

Return-Path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tcpm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775D63A6994; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5806B3A6947 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WkFz-h+Yl-5O for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:05:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.234]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D253A6B3C for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so724958rvf.49 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=N+LPzuDE7+K1kiqf4DojaPWlAEY7IcNtJGXxOdZ9SVY=; b=YERrz7jaGdjBK4negw6kdhzTm62n1+GzZZykRI+98DMs5hFzK/3NKrlLyFNq59h89F cH2LLuqBc1RFOPs/BuKKwC+tS5dYcl5I404WFt1g9jE8f5dIY3FqDe+U4NxryMSQRL61 EdnY7EvU61lZVI1917EnX5Q9cAG/gYEMOecpE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=umOfvCIaDcK5nKUTU+FkR6kkf3xgrB1VDCuAm/3nem0fHj2/J51vblpMlX4SLyLPJL RP2JWYqjZGZcwl8kv2IQ6z2aucM12rjeCsC/v2mQ6O0nq91sWfLnmgZV3SEcGGcO1FXl 89Gl9j3UcLLVFSUDONUvkqhueoBKHQAcamHJs=
Received: by 10.140.172.19 with SMTP id u19mr5639316rve.31.1217552699107; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.141.186.3 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <396556a20807311804s14169c14hfcf7d139475472f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:04:59 -0700
From: "Adam Langley" <agl@imperialviolet.org>
To: "Joe Touch" <touch@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <396556a20807311640w2b17d447ud0c51241dc84f682@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <396556a20807311252j67b1ab26mf6511dbdae780fdd@mail.gmail.com> <48924496.9060907@isi.edu> <396556a20807311640w2b17d447ud0c51241dc84f682@mail.gmail.com>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0245077a57f1c39b
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Faster application handshakes with SYN/ACK payloads
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

I've updated the draft with the following changes:
  * Fixed the wording around retransmissions which mistakenly
suggested that no packets of any type could be transmitted without
payloads
  * Renamed the flag to SYNACK Payloads Processed
  * Required that the flag be echoed in resulting SYNACK frames
  * Added discussion of simultaneous open
  * Added discussion of SYNACKs with payloads that are nothing to do
with this spec, noting that they are still permitted

I'll wait to see if there are more comments on -00 before publishing -01.

Cheers


AGL

-- 
Adam Langley agl@imperialviolet.org http://www.imperialviolet.org
_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm