IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] comments on draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-05

Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Mon, 15 June 2009 03:01 UTC

Return-Path: <fernando.gont.netbook.win@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1AFD3A6ADB for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 20:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sX91Nvl5n-y6 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 20:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f130.google.com (mail-qy0-f130.google.com [209.85.221.130]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E435E3A6900 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 20:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk36 with SMTP id 36so11779qyk.29 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 20:01:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ST9zGKNNDthTLnadfrWBezQV3pkE+hvt0rRNkivB5CM=; b=J9hAEQGOK9xXVXugR9slGKzHS5rX57Ilhld9+faFhEiGcbvO0aOXrl6yFnk79NSErg 2OdqTXEpiR9Amz6IbuPFSZUMDOHYCIVLJkh1duN9umxFmbqL79jUngCUUjTIHapa1lxQ FOyw0GXKxhK7gWJjpNxKI4M2thD+Y3StcAgxU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=YGML/JtzhOYtWuX+uB7Yhe+17wNwUl0dce7pIHvdfY7icEGCtlCg6U8viKx1enjEAa RiJmiYVc+ODynWcpmoWzqX7CqV5PF0+SWOfluw9VInfZwAilYX+jVQDVFsDEI9xZ4uWA ePDhdqH2LFzTSmmmm0Jdqlbbr4TTWSq1W8OoE=
Received: by 10.224.11.18 with SMTP id r18mr6769403qar.63.1245034901989; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 20:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?192.168.0.151? (148-82-231-201.fibertel.com.ar [201.231.82.148]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm652708qwd.42.2009.06.14.20.01.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 14 Jun 2009 20:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Fernando Gont <fernando.gont.netbook.win@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4A35B98D.9040103@gont.com.ar>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:01:33 -0300
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB221796D53C@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov> <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB221796D53D@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov> <87ljnvey5y.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
In-Reply-To: <87ljnvey5y.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
OpenPGP: id=D076FFF1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] comments on draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-05
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 03:01:34 -0000

Florian Weimer wrote:

> (Disclaimer: I don't like the way UNIRAS/CPNI handled some
> disclosures, but I think this isn't important in this context.)

FWIW, when it comes to these ICMP issues, I had reported them to both
NISCC and CERT/CC at the same time. And I sticked with NISCC/CPNI
because I got a much better response from them. IIRC, Paul Watson (TCP
reset attacks) has a very similar story.

If there are any specific issues you didn't like how UNIRAS/CPNI
handled, feel free to comment them off-list, and I will relay them to
CPNI. They are always open for suggestions and improvement.

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email