Re: [tcpm] New Version Notification for draft-touch-tcpm-tcp-edo-01.txt

[Joe Touch <[e-mail]>]

On 5/2/2014 7:45 AM, Wesley Eddy wrote:
> On 5/2/2014 7:18 AM, Pasi Sarolahti wrote:
>>
>> On 26 Apr 2014, at 01:19, Joe Touch <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to ask the chairs if we can consider a call to make this a
>>> WG doc?
>>>
>>> (given the work of the group is supposed to happen on the list -
>>> and I don't attend meetings in person these days -this doesn't seem
>>> like it needs to wait for a meeting to proceed)
>>
>> We should discuss the possible WG adoption on the list before the
>> meeting, and some people have already voiced their support. But there
>> is value in discussing this in the f2f meeting, too, before
>> confirming WG adoption (hum). Perhaps Wes can present this, or as the
>> last resort the presentation could be proxied by chairs. I don't see
>> any reason to hurry this so that we couldn't wait until the Toronto
>> meeting.
>
> That would be fine with me.  IMO, it would be nice to know what
> the perceived mailing list consensus is, and use the meeting to
> confirm that.  It's only a couple months away.

I'm not in a rush, but as a point of order:

	- work happens on the mailing list, NOT at the meetings

	- decisions at the meeting are confirmed on the list,
	not the other way around

That's why I don't see why we need to wait for the meeting. Meetings are 
places where we typically hash out issues that arise on the list, e.g.:
	a. post to the list
	b. need for interactive clarification arises
	c. meeting supports interactive clarification
	d. decision happens back on the list

Somewhere along the line this all got reversed. I would like to 
encourage the chairs to use case as an opportunity to try the intended 
process.

Joe