[tcpm] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-16: (with COMMENT)

Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 08 July 2020 15:36 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider@ietf.org, tcpm-chairs@ietf.org, tcpm@ietf.org, Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>, nsd.ietf@gmail.com
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Message-ID: <159422257236.6987.12408412094777683810@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 08:36:12 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/NgB8Uf2GphZlHeHmTtxjWgSqJ-U>
Subject: [tcpm] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-16: (with COMMENT)

Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-16: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with Ben that the use of "we" and "our" is a little jarring and the
document would be improved if those instances could be changed.

[tcpm] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf… Alissa Cooper via Datatracker