Re: [tcpm] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-12: (with COMMENT)

gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk Thu, 25 June 2015 07:14 UTC

Return-Path: <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9256B1B2A91; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 00:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jvHd0us2RX2z; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 00:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:241:204::f0f0]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC58C1B30AF; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 00:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from erg.abdn.ac.uk (galactica.erg.abdn.ac.uk [139.133.210.32]) by pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 897BD1B00140; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 08:13:52 +0100 (BST)
Received: from 212.159.18.54 (SquirrelMail authenticated user gorry) by erg.abdn.ac.uk with HTTP; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 08:13:19 +0100
Message-ID: <7f951897ff37eaff66410fd196413258.squirrel@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20150625012721.13983.71237.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20150625012721.13983.71237.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 08:13:19 +0100
From: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk
To: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, kaduk@DOMAIN.HIDDEN
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.23 [SVN]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/OFv8zZEU3SXx4MZFoHUt3eLl_88>
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, tcpm-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 07:14:32 -0000

Kathleen,

We'd like to thank the Secdir reviewer for these comments. Sorry for not
responding directly - we believe these issues were resolved in rev 12, but
we will check carefully against the final revision that we are preparing.

Gorry

> Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-12: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> It does not appear that the SecDir review got a response, maybe the
> editor and shepherd didn't see it?
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg05697.html
>
> He included a bunch of nits that might be helpful.
>
>