IETF Logo Mail Archive

[tcpm] Replacing with AIMD emulation (was Re: Poll for CUBIC RFC updates)

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Wed, 18 November 2020 08:28 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F4693A1671 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 00:28:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UeqxNux39Mf9 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 00:28:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:211:32ff:fe22:186f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AA663A1670 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 00:28:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:ade6:53ee:6b75:dc4d] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:ade6:53ee:6b75:dc4d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D4C96103C9; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 10:28:30 +0200 (EET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1605688110; bh=EC9vSn2wClDhH05CvS4N+EYQOoasxcyEgBjCRJnAozQ=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=TxZBVjPTpt0QvuYeM88nNtqmyzKVHoLOH3K0RIQuH5EihDgIoqaMwdVv6nDQBVwwu mbbtY311Ck976qwQAuG8Ghql0j4KrYbbnS9dXL5Fans0l50gHZ2A5el7XLkOp8uz5y GtGjVG+npqElDNOkUI+TKDBHbLQUjH0sSX+8Dxa8=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <D749390B-BD09-468A-AF00-D93BC1DA447B@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F10EAEAE-A65F-40BD-BA18-C860FFBDA028"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 10:28:30 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAK6E8=eSiH_iNgOFMRXjQ_0yBCgXDqMd4gxbqzSARgHWRiv5OA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs.ietf@gmx.at>, Vidhi Goel <vidhi_goel=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
To: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <02721B41-690E-4CC2-BC26-223EDA4BFA45@apple.com> <b8726c1c-c38a-4583-f250-fe8ac466155e@gmx.at> <CAK6E8=eSiH_iNgOFMRXjQ_0yBCgXDqMd4gxbqzSARgHWRiv5OA@mail.gmail.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: 8D4C96103C9.A2FD5
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/OMjYniPjKY1nI_GJETlrKZ1-WLA>
Subject: [tcpm] Replacing with AIMD emulation (was Re: Poll for CUBIC RFC updates)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:28:44 -0000

On 2020-11-17, at 19:50, Yuchung Cheng <ycheng=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> I'd recommend replacing the modelled TCP Reno window approach in
> section 4.2 with an AIMD emulation (Linux's approach).

<snip>

I created https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/20 to track this suggestion.

Thanks,
Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email