Re: [tcpm] WG status update

There is one equation that has an error baring that there isn't much of an update. I'll make that edit today or tomorrow and submit. But that edit shouldn't really block this from being adopted in my opinion as it is well understood and discussed earlier. Since I never got a chance to resubmit the ID to TCPM till now I hadn't formally made that change. 

Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tcpm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lars Eggert
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 5:45 PM
To: Richard Scheffenegger; Murari Sridharan
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tcpm] WG status update

Hi,

I may be confused, but I thought Murari said that an updater was pending. If there isn't, this can of course be adopted now.

And as an individual contributor, I'd like to see that, as well as Cubic.

Lars

On 2010-11-10, at 20:35, Scheffenegger, Richard wrote:

> 
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sridharan-tcpm-ctcp-02
> Status: polled for interest on 6/16/10
>        one positive response; no negative - too weak for adoption
> 
> 
> I have been under the impression, that Lars specifically approached 
> the authors to update and resubmit a new revision of the draft, before 
> this can move forward.
> 
> For the record, I share the opinion of Anumita (adopt this as WG item, 
> updated with the most recent studies on stability / ICCRG input).
> 
> Ditto for draft-rhee-tcpm-cubic
> 
> 
> Richard Scheffenegger
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm