[tcpm] Weekly github digest (RFC8312bis Activity Summary)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 24 October 2021 12:51 UTC
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DDC63A084B
for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 05:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=mnot.net header.b=SxUpeY7+;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=NaUc1LZQ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id hQYV5Pw2wcoP for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sun, 24 Oct 2021 05:51:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com
[66.111.4.28])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 625973A0967
for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 05:50:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44])
by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF785C07A8
for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 03:39:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163])
by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 24 Oct 2021 03:39:21 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=
content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject; s=fm1; bh=UFyVIjrChri
szStLQp4uXiUlXO+EjlqNaDaP8mFkcuM=; b=SxUpeY7+SWO2Fg8yVM8JrVF33h0
g30BZpcmhuGIe3AbJH4gbhbebgmsBc5gQ6wxHQuPbe1MYCF/6qRhK3jYwT/NhLq4
bvhz2fJH2gi2QFDM/KTf/iC3zuVAy2cmbqrljhndSR2Lm7ezy9b0iOrBxex/UoAo
zwjpU9JYvjgUqYfZYw1l37E2wOB0uCFngphV2YoiHBKbdgbav1WWEyWUngWG+u49
obMAbkXJVVBSo6U6RQigQzI8RFUnLgTTfKTduEQDo4OuG3RrIwH9+U8P/fiuGe4C
nP1xsFO1qM3YuAZACq1zBA7ZiXEEcCDoBymTxD2sc99kFjmrmeLAyjcm/pQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=content-type:from:mime-version:subject:to
:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=
fm1; bh=UFyVIjrChriszStLQp4uXiUlXO+EjlqNaDaP8mFkcuM=; b=NaUc1LZQ
670/S7QjEOHR3Q7Cu6+fKlQxRZR7udqa9zW+KuJOcj+7xUGJ9mDc2U/qLJoJSf4g
XMHRv1WX1w8oaTkRiBCjjUh2xZe7wONrgNPScb8+2Uz15f9yYWWF2qFegqsW79G2
pC7rDwkDJeMnV8/S62Wco+EWalNLQhLxbwxCXfz9ymJDzLj1E6xWIrVmbLSKiKfH
SAdNHX4/HL3X12dSMT0/6JLCpzqB58m55ZYqLOEm64pMu51/J2DuWWWOdUC5xG1a
FcAFMfIetPEIDDmX/wSMgtX2LyXljISMQUNcdlZzXKdh7UYl7FqrONyCBRW+u/3/
dRbi/AiZDgp6Tg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:qQ11Yedrgolc3ot2CfTQ3uaZj1Q8IznVRu-oFjJHLHUTZUQITBZpBQ>
<xme:qQ11YYOXY8wWk3C84oRX0NZAbcVympt49R7tfUYTvng1vVIVreoBcWBkuI4CHK-3F
VCrYmwV1zjUEUMuSQ>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:qQ11YfiMq74GXpGPlIKn_uKQLYanoMvx8wXhKzh2oLX7sxUsBTzPgxeAzhgHoIgDKMD5B35OKTkQSj1D1_OgTdYeGCDxbaqlo8PDIZtni826r6i3pkV3xq-OSYi-xrvTlnU>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvdefvddgvddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf
fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen
uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucfpohcuuggrthgvuchfihgvlhguucdlgeelmdenuc
fjughrpegtggfhvffusegrtddtredttdejnecuhfhrohhmpeftvghpohhsihhtohhrhicu
tegtthhivhhithihucfuuhhmmhgrrhihuceuohhtuceoughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihse
hmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeefvdduteejvdefkeehieevuefg
fefhteetveegffekffefteffvdelheduieetnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtg
homhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpeefnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegu
ohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:qQ11Yb9BNZlxlXEF_Xy_ot1ehBGlMvD_7VoEeR3Iz4ahYTTWcK8ytw>
<xmx:qQ11YatcFo-6aIHMsEvO_d2jFH1QUhMqBVggodU6MKRgk6kTUkiVKw>
<xmx:qQ11YSGzUTw-7gOULY6fWYWf-n7G54wGfU7nzpN5vFP4jVQsgDb0ig>
<xmx:qQ11YT408qvwRsw7C6L9FaRT2Sb8IrWcpm7Sx0MrjIT7UWSy4n_L7A>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for
<tcpm@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 03:39:21 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="===============5435675151087568312=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: tcpm@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20211024125049.625973A0967@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 05:50:49 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/OYu1paW9PfIqId5oYQMBSFyZriI>
Subject: [tcpm] Weekly github digest (RFC8312bis Activity Summary)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>,
<mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>,
<mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 12:51:17 -0000
Events
Issues
------
* NTAP/rfc8312bis (+0/-7/💬28)
8 issues received 28 new comments:
- #114 Use FlightSize instead of cwnd (7 by goelvidhi, larseggert, lisongxu, mattmathis, nealcardwell, yuchungcheng)
https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/114
- #96 Sec 5.6 (2 by bbriscoe, lisongxu)
https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/96
- #94 Sec 5.4 (2 by bbriscoe, markkukojo)
https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/94
- #93 Sec 5.3 (1 by lisongxu)
https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/93
- #91 Discussion in Sec 5. brings up surprisingly little data (2 by larseggert, sangtaeha)
https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/91
- #90 Citing Experimental RFCs as if being a part of CUBIC (9 by goelvidhi, larseggert, markkukojo, nealcardwell)
https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/90 [WG LC]
- #89 Contribution to buffer bloat and slower convergence due to larger decrease factor (3 by larseggert, lisongxu)
https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/89
- #85 RFC 8511 handling of ECE signal (slow start vs congestion avoidance) (2 by bbriscoe, larseggert)
https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/85
7 issues closed:
- Contribution to buffer bloat and slower convergence due to larger decrease factor https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/89
- Sec 5.4 https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/94
- Lower bound for congestion window (drops or classic ECN) https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/83
- Slow-Start Overshoot w/ loss-based congestion conrol https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/86
- RFC 8511 handling of ECE signal (slow start vs congestion avoidance) https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/85
- Citing Experimental RFCs as if being a part of CUBIC https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/90 [WG LC]
- Sec 5.3 https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/93
Pull requests
-------------
* NTAP/rfc8312bis (+2/-3/💬6)
2 pull requests submitted:
- #114 Use FlightSize instead of cwnd (by lisongxu)
https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/pull/126
- From @bbriscoe (by larseggert)
https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/pull/125
3 pull requests received 6 new comments:
- #126 #114 Use FlightSize instead of cwnd (1 by goelvidhi)
https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/pull/126
- #125 From @bbriscoe (1 by goelvidhi)
https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/pull/125
- #124 cwnd should be at least 1 and after that use timer (4 by goelvidhi, markkukojo)
https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/pull/124
3 pull requests merged:
- PR of @lisongxu's suggestion for #94
https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/pull/123
- cwnd should be at least 1 and after that use timer
https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/pull/124
- Rephrase text around algorithmic alternatives.
https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/pull/111
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis
- [tcpm] Weekly github digest (RFC8312bis Activity … Repository Activity Summary Bot