Re: [tcpm] A question on tcpsecure & meeting minutes
Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> Fri, 04 April 2008 12:13 UTC
Return-Path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tcpm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F8328C62A; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 05:13:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A116C28C40C for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 05:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RFUa87dMggla for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 05:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pork.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (pork.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU [192.150.186.19]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A17928C62A for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 05:13:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from guns.icir.org (adsl-69-222-35-58.dsl.bcvloh.ameritech.net [69.222.35.58]) by pork.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m34CDEo8014207; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 05:13:15 -0700
Received: from lawyers.icir.org (adsl-69-222-35-58.dsl.bcvloh.ameritech.net [69.222.35.58]) by guns.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A6B11DFB4E4; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 08:12:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lawyers.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lawyers.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 938804778E8; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 08:11:39 -0400 (EDT)
To: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
From: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <200804040658.m346wwtw000534@venus.xmundo.net>
Organization: International Computer Science Institute (ICSI)
Song-of-the-Day: Dreams
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 08:11:36 -0400
Message-Id: <20080404121139.938804778E8@lawyers.icir.org>
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tcpm] A question on tcpsecure & meeting minutes
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mallman@icir.org
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0996957350=="
Sender: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
> I have just read the minutes from the last IETF meeting, and it says
> tcpsecure has been through WGLC.
That is because that is what I said. :-)
However, you're right that I mis-spoke. With all the drafts we have in
various stages I just botched this.
The status is ...
+ We have nailed down the recommendation levels for the various
mechanisms.
+ Those levels need worked into the document.
+ Then it seems that all outstanding issues have been taken care of
and we can do WGLC.
So, in other words it seems "WGLC is imminent" is the better summary.
Thanks for catching this bit of confusion.
allman
_______________________________________________ tcpm mailing list tcpm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
- [tcpm] A question on tcpsecure & meeting minutes Fernando Gont
- Re: [tcpm] A question on tcpsecure & meeting minu… Mark Allman
- Re: [tcpm] A question on tcpsecure & meeting minu… Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)