IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] TCP-AO review comments.

Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Sun, 10 August 2008 11:12 UTC

Return-Path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tcpm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 424083A68F2; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 04:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E33973A6DD1 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 04:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b3NgCQMHNh0o for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 04:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F7233A68F2 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 04:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [75.193.28.133] (133.sub-75-193-28.myvzw.com [75.193.28.133]) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m7ABBuul024553 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 10 Aug 2008 04:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <489ECCD2.9010608@isi.edu>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 04:11:14 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stefanos Harhalakis <v13@v13.gr>
References: <0C53DCFB700D144284A584F54711EC58058C2FD4@xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com> <48939933.3030601@isi.edu> <C4CB96A1-6990-48A2-AF3E-A429C0DBE312@nokia.com> <200808101237.46574.v13@v13.gr>
In-Reply-To: <200808101237.46574.v13@v13.gr>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org, "Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)" <ananth@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] TCP-AO review comments.
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Stefanos Harhalakis wrote:
...
| Also, is there any good in including a (1-byte - or smaller with some
unused
| bits) version field in TCP-AO? This will help similar future
| extensions/replacements and will also allow for easier authentication
option
| handshaking by falling back to the highest commonly supported method.

<indiv hat on>
Options don't typically have version numbers; they're implicit in the
option KIND itself. IMO, that's why TCP-AO is requesting a new KIND value.

Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkiezNIACgkQE5f5cImnZruxEgCfTexydjMG154rrCc7BiuG5NsM
06EAni11kV39sqN/ni9c7spixnFKGN2a
=xCV2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email