IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-25: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com> Mon, 20 September 2021 17:10 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5451B3A09D6; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 10:10:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.318
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.318 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K1XLKzH1UUYa; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 10:10:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-1.web-hosting.com (server217-1.web-hosting.com [198.54.114.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F08A3A09D5; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 10:10:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=+85RPWetPIi0U/8FgBXx0yK0pvpc6mgqsMCquXU1RLY=; b=dKYvpfwtdUoWorVaJbhitEKZc7 gB7Shjb3aLGPphi+PKsRDF5dXAZCV54/0q9Qq7joToAzmRhBcu9h8tK+TV6Hv9d38LmsG+MobZHgv Gx6aEtAzk2PvoA8YO/bMhOFCN+MqfeCv3zz7P9g7lFsaouMO/xZ2d4xyQmdfUH/YdZc8QE06tYEZj sTEjgFSPkzEcg8qfI2omibDV3HG5ydWngXNp5xYaPhPL7pW97IqqQ786MwaVzaH6WXaQf+qNHGKeZ 8d4fF+mxBpHX4J/8mUSIPR8Zkcy9daN2bGtpFsVpo/qYibmAGnukabob0orW/CtDBv0/ww/j18gEk 2uQIEJqQ==;
Received: from cpe-172-114-237-88.socal.res.rr.com ([172.114.237.88]:64624 helo=smtpclient.apple) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1mSMns-00FOgD-2D; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:10:09 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F5658FBB-7957-4F8D-A544-A624E2509CF0"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
From: "touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <163214753544.31399.10999213705568724513@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 10:09:57 -0700
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis@ietf.org, "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>, tcpm-chairs@ietf.org
Message-Id: <148668DE-14CF-47E2-B264-1707A309971A@strayalpha.com>
References: <163214753544.31399.10999213705568724513@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/PBLByLG-H8l0WpBtR3MM-UveIrA>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-25: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 17:10:17 -0000

Hi, all,


> On Sep 20, 2021, at 7:18 AM, Lars Eggert via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-25: Discuss
> 
> ...
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> The IESG needs to approve the following DOWNREFs during the telechat:
> …
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Section 3.1. , paragraph 50, comment:
>>     Note: There is ongoing work to extend the space available for TCP
>>     options, such as [64].
> 
> draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-edo has been dead for four years, not sure how useful it is
> to point to.

Were drafts not archived by the IETF, I would agree, but they are, so they remain useful.

Further, it isn’t “dead”; it hasn’t changed. I no longer perform in-place updates when there are no changes.

I discussed how to move it forward with the chairs in July 2020. Based on that discussion the deadline was moved to Nov 2022, largely due to my limited cycles for concurrent drafts, focusing on 2140bis first.

Regardless, it remains a comprehensive description of the issues.

Joe

—
Joe Touch, temporal epistemologist
www.strayalpha.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email