RE: [tcpm] WGLC for UTO

<toby.moncaster@bt.com> Wed, 07 November 2007 09:15 UTC

Return-path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iph0c-0003tf-Lq; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 04:15:38 -0500
Received: from tcpm by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Iph0a-0003p8-23 for tcpm-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 04:15:36 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iph0U-0003m7-Vt for tcpm@ietf.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 04:15:30 -0500
Received: from smtp4.smtp.bt.com ([217.32.164.151]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iph0Q-0008NL-Ux for tcpm@ietf.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 04:15:30 -0500
Received: from E03MVZ4-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.30.63]) by smtp4.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 7 Nov 2007 09:15:25 +0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [tcpm] WGLC for UTO
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 09:14:12 -0000
Message-ID: <BAB4DC0CD5148948A86BD047A85CE2A7017EDB4F@E03MVZ4-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [tcpm] WGLC for UTO
Thread-Index: Acgf0ENtKjJfCoRARJehxuqLOKYy8gBTkxNu
References: <20071015161355.CDC992CA32C@lawyers.icir.org> <44C4AF94-CC5D-4702-914E-764583E2AADA@nokia.com> <78C9135A3D2ECE4B8162EBDCE82CAD77026345DE@nekter> <4717E7D6.7000407@isi.edu> <14C200C0-73DE-4550-A1E2-5B43BEE29BAF@nokia.com> <472756CC.8070809@isi.edu> <582A6F13-12CC-4B5C-8415-CBDAD73116AA@nokia.com> <4728A553.2020300@isi.edu> <6B3D5E1D-F2DA-428C-AAEF-6F548F48F4F5@nokia.com> <3DF7B46C-5246-470E-9C98-08A5AEADDAF3@nokia.com> <472F36FC.1030301@isi.edu> <001BF967-9D6E-4583-8C08-6B4AC29A567C@nokia.com>
From: <toby.moncaster@bt.com>
To: <lars.eggert@nokia.com>, <touch@ISI.EDU>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Nov 2007 09:15:25.0997 (UTC) FILETIME=[BB9615D0:01C8211E]
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
X-Scan-Signature: a7d6aff76b15f3f56fcb94490e1052e4
Cc: ah@tr-sys.de, tcpm@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

I think the document as stands (in your latest diffed version) seems fine. (I'm not an expert on SYN cookies though...)
 
Toby

________________________________

From: Lars Eggert [mailto:lars.eggert@nokia.com]
Sent: Mon 05/11/2007 17:20
To: ext Joe Touch
Cc: ext Alfred HÎnes; tcpm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tcpm] WGLC for UTO



On 2007-11-5, at 17:30, ext Joe Touch wrote:
> Lars Eggert wrote:
>> There were some suggestions discussed in response to Joe's and 
>> Alfred's
>> comments that I haven't made, because the rest of the WG was silent,
>> which I interpreted as lack of consensus for the change. Speak up 
>> if you
>> disagree with this resolution.
>
> I have spoken before on this point in general. Apathy is not 
> consensus.
>
> Apathy can be a reason to not include a change, but that's the reason.
> Not consensus.

My understanding is that we have *had* consensus on what the document 
currently says about the two points in question (whether to include 
the UTO in both the SYN and the first non-SYN, and whether UTO is 
supposed to be transmitted reliably) since these points were 
discussed a few revisions back.

I'm not opposed to making changes if the consensus has changed. But I 
have difficulties determining whether this is the case. I'd 
appreciate some additional WG comments on this.

Lars 



_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm