Re: [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9235 (7040)

"touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com> Mon, 25 July 2022 23:55 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29770C14F612 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 16:55:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.324
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.324 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6wXkwyvoufMw for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 16:55:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-2.web-hosting.com (server217-2.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36B48C15B24B for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 16:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=7unhM2lVjEEy+EZBTedoPqk8TOTWjR6RbY3bEkSwEck=; b=tVytMoTa6+9XVN/A7in0s73nFH iSOY+lApDixz7C5cDH9Iu06KgQ2cXQCtyZZFmK9i9ts0bnVl7PYJjozsIgCFBYWY5ZJpU8/j9F+Y5 Hd2P3ywNAvlxOAJXJ63YxCzwaniLltlJEKfMSCEXYA1M6iCBqBD+guzqD6CR43CmWFtVxcdifVc3z gx9TqLGYR4F+gTmROxt7YWbtfzPGSqu6L77RizxEcl+uaE0sPoeSDn2nw7lsBSo8ocwPbSZyFtYQ3 mNJ9iL7+yKfKGrZ3VtfjRcDa/pSD70dGP+XkU4xpgJJVp4xFqz/yUG59wF/37PrMbB/Wrv3X7PdaS N/IhcEPQ==;
Received: from c-73-29-228-215.hsd1.nj.comcast.net ([73.29.228.215]:51405 helo=smtpclient.apple) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1oG7ub-00EWHz-Tw; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 19:55:02 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_35384B46-7AF7-43D1-9536-200ABC2CEA67"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: "touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220725100552.E34F1289CB@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 19:54:55 -0400
Cc: Juhamatti Kuusisaari <jkuusisaari@infinera.com>, martin.h.duke@gmail.com, Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com, nsd.ietf@gmail.com, tuexen@fh-muenster.de, ianswett@google.com, tcpm@ietf.org
Message-Id: <91FDA39E-66A1-46F7-BCE5-229A4B95493A@strayalpha.com>
References: <20220725100552.E34F1289CB@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/PGgpRgrmX6w_JTuV4uF7BH0h-OU>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9235 (7040)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 23:55:53 -0000

IMO, all of these errata should be collected and resubmitted as a single aggregate erratum.

There is no utility in issuing these independently; they have the same cause.

(I have commented on only one, but the issue applies to the whole set - another reason they should not have been filed independently.)

Joe

—
Dr. Joe Touch, temporal epistemologist
www.strayalpha.com

> On Jul 25, 2022, at 6:05 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9235,
> "TCP Authentication Option (TCP-AO) Test Vectors".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7040
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Michael Tüxen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
> 
> Section: 5.1.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>   IP/TCP:
> 
>     45 e0 00 4c 7b 9f 40 00 ff 06 20 dc 0a 0b 0c 0d
>     ac 1b 1c 1d c4 fa 00 b3 78 7a 1d df 00 00 00 00
>     e0 02 ff ff 5a 0f 00 00 02 04 05 b4 01 03 03 08
>     04 02 08 0a 00 01 7e d0 00 00 00 00 1d 10 3d 54
>     e4 77 e9 9c 80 40 76 54 98 e5 50 91
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>   IP/TCP:
> 
>     45 e0 00 4c 7b 9f 40 00 ff 06 20 dc 0a 0b 0c 0d
>     ac 1b 1c 1d c4 fa 00 b3 78 7a 1d df 00 00 00 00
>     e0 02 ff ff 46 41 00 00 02 04 05 b4 01 03 03 08
>     04 02 08 0a 00 01 7e d0 00 00 00 00 1d 10 3d 54
>     e4 77 e9 9c 80 40 76 54 98 e5 50 91
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The TCP checksum shown (0x5a0f) is wrong, it should be 0x4641.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC9235 (draft-ietf-tcpm-ao-test-vectors-09)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : TCP Authentication Option (TCP-AO) Test Vectors
> Publication Date    : May 2022
> Author(s)           : J. Touch, J. Kuusisaari
> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
> Source              : TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions
> Area                : Transport
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm