Re: [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5681 (5458)

"Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Mon, 13 August 2018 09:35 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD9D130EBB for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 02:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=ietf@kuehlewind.net header.d=kuehlewind.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id flMQPINzwKe2 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 02:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kuehlewind.net (kuehlewind.net [83.169.45.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDD64130E97 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 02:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=kuehlewind.net; b=pHJuk/tu58MP0inG/OqNuDm8PXhd/IvCobE+Q6s0JeGN8ZSKCrICxIWHSzU/6b70zAA1e/M9cxsSwvikX8S6MBFeWjfJ/mxJG/wQrur2If6Mjo90vygYWpD+uLiS7UVC+nWt0eGRr+X4xbKxp+XsB9asYXESMauz27sv0LqUBv4=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:X-Mailer:X-PPP-Message-ID:X-PPP-Vhost;
Received: (qmail 29685 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2018 11:34:37 +0200
Received: from mue-88-130-61-222.dsl.tropolys.de (HELO ?192.168.178.24?) (88.130.61.222) by kuehlewind.net with ESMTPSA (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 13 Aug 2018 11:34:37 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <FF03ED2A-B3D6-4F2D-8AD4-DCC598916F9A@fh-muenster.de>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 11:34:35 +0200
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, tcpm@ietf.org, vern@icir.org, jmccauley@cs.berkeley.edu, mallman@icir.org, eblanton@cs.purdue.edu, spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C00B3882-8B5B-4050-B2C7-AD72F5733803@kuehlewind.net>
References: <20180812233312.9C2DCB819E8@rfc-editor.org> <FF03ED2A-B3D6-4F2D-8AD4-DCC598916F9A@fh-muenster.de>
To: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
X-PPP-Message-ID: <20180813093437.29674.61486@lvps83-169-45-111.dedicated.hosteurope.de>
X-PPP-Vhost: kuehlewind.net
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/PONM6NmJ9cSHcxinsHcdTbd-Z3E>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5681 (5458)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 09:35:43 -0000

Verified as editorial errata.

> Am 13.08.2018 um 11:01 schrieb Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>de>:
> 
>> On 13. Aug 2018, at 01:33, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
>> 
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5681,
>> "TCP Congestion Control".
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5458
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Technical
>> Reported by: James McCauley <jmccauley@cs.berkeley.edu>
>> 
>> Section: 2
>> 
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>>  DUPLICATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT: An acknowledgment is considered a
>>     "duplicate" in the following algorithms when (a) the receiver of
>>     the ACK has outstanding data, (b) the incoming acknowledgment
>>     carries no data, (c) the SYN and FIN bits are both off, (d) the
>>     acknowledgment number is equal to the greatest acknowledgment
>>     received on the given connection (TCP.UNA from [RFC793]) and (e)
>>     the advertised window in the incoming acknowledgment equals the
>>     advertised window in the last incoming acknowledgment.
>> 
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>>  DUPLICATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT: An acknowledgment is considered a
>>     "duplicate" in the following algorithms when (a) the receiver of
>>     the ACK has outstanding data, (b) the incoming acknowledgment
>>     carries no data, (c) the SYN and FIN bits are both off, (d) the
>>     acknowledgment number is equal to the greatest acknowledgment
>>     received on the given connection (SND.UNA from [RFC793]) and (e)
>>     the advertised window in the incoming acknowledgment equals the
>>     advertised window in the last incoming acknowledgment.
>> 
>> Notes
>> -----
>> There is no such thing as TCP.UNA in RFC793.  The boundary between acknowledged and unacknowledged sent data is SND.UNA.
> I agree.
> 
> Best regards
> Michael
>> 
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC5681 (draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc2581bis-07)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : TCP Congestion Control
>> Publication Date    : September 2009
>> Author(s)           : M. Allman, V. Paxson, E. Blanton
>> Category            : DRAFT STANDARD
>> Source              : TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions
>> Area                : Transport
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm