IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Moving forward draft-touch-sne on independent stream?

Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Mon, 29 November 2021 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D9443A0807; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 11:29:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BCvmN2f8Y5qT; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 11:29:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa31.google.com (mail-vk1-xa31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 979ED3A081B; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 11:29:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa31.google.com with SMTP id u68so11867206vke.11; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 11:29:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yxI8oxa8mmouM3wEL7sHzEI7QlYl2yumjR054/wWwfE=; b=bDsWuxFaFavXnyggKjg+56FQqVg4c7/Y7ObAfMP7PyHiL1pwqFRroP9IZJnwqBxEYF r7b01Qbx2M1uBYv199a88V3ULlvSfbGKHpnjso6vpa0KFEUBuPMs1rcv2OGz0DZoER4D wBcrrzLhCN05/aHCij+wBWA5hrUmHjr0mIb2fixwxQXf/ulAuBN6Os0R1DXtwQwE7WCr bJdJ1xr1jBaF6WJWoFkrYsYG07bLwHMZ4kc6TYGgyejwHCEAR58/bE/nlf8M8aJP6ckZ eDioIBMlnsaxe+ddjZldgBkmGoPUsnMM826v/ycDIJRn0PmY07GE6nnYWGjbSnnuFPWh PEkw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yxI8oxa8mmouM3wEL7sHzEI7QlYl2yumjR054/wWwfE=; b=Di5CNhizvKrLPIvaFSvDKaEhDLnt/Ezj9xAD4JukeEn61C+cwTvCZHUUmS4j1UA3Bp TrmIiYAceT9+eOW1Z9fov10AtvAOi8SRX8sOVPAVfi2T3ma1+qCIXe5KgFMrxd2PDNWt sqVq8Nyp5166xMFPJ3z6zTS32FaBF9OTUUxBy02Z8EleepAalpLMayJZlWsoOa/TE+z9 elOXM6nT/cTgvtmPA+DfkwPSPxvOA152BK7XSiSdGBBsnOxeltTdfwifoyH45Za1QW4U o6U7F7srIhkkddPlh1VKBD+Eer9291ZGnlT8igyYcmeNeIn3c6Ksmg2uaz0L3RW7cUx8 JWCg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533TCK3khFyQ1nXfKHVAd1jLF+vwPdeduqwVvmixT8KbVMIgjxDx /0/WzdC6llz3Mlas5UlDRWVJId2Oqm92ygjYSNuP/OCG
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyBkzCcqfHZ3uxl8DJJFRU1hXntzUW3OgUc2OL3gCopEA/BGU/1Vo6dbiZ6qMqSnpNSyJJPki+RaYx1lC9fRJw=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:27d5:: with SMTP id n204mr4345457vkn.32.1638214172715; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 11:29:32 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <8de93237209d4fc7ab062bbc24217999@hs-esslingen.de>
In-Reply-To: <8de93237209d4fc7ab062bbc24217999@hs-esslingen.de>
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 11:29:21 -0800
Message-ID: <CAM4esxSKH_QTsVb5-nLOxVY3_f8-=wxhhutrkdWR2btH0njciA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>, "tcpm-chairs@ietf.org" <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d4af1b05d1f2753e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/RFwqeQ83JTLlnBSCI8eoclRo2XM>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Moving forward draft-touch-sne on independent stream?
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 19:29:41 -0000

The conflict review is now in my inbox, and we will discuss it on December
2nd. If there are any concerns about this, please say so immediately.

On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 1:05 PM Scharf, Michael <
Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Joe has submitted draft-touch-sne to the ISE asking for publication of an
> RFC on the Independent Stream. (Background: An RFC on Independent Stream is
> not an IETF standard.)
>
> Publication on independent stream would be possible provided that the
> document does not conflict with TCPM or other IETF work. An obvious
> alternative would be homing the document in TCPM (or TSVWG) as an official
> WG item - but this is not what is currently proposed.
>
> A link to the document is:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-touch-sne
>
> Note that the current header field "TCPM" would have to be replaced in the
> further publication process, as documents on the independent stream are not
> the outcome of an IETF WG.
>
> The TCPM chairs have reviewed draft-touch-sne. Our current understanding
> that there would be no harm caused by such an independent stream
> publication. As far as RFC 5925 is affected, we assume that an Errata would
> be possible and sufficient.
>
> Before we get back to the ISE regarding this document, we would like to
> cross-check whether our understanding is indeed the TCPM consensus:
>
> Are there any concerns inside the TCPM community regarding a publication
> of draft-touch-sne draft-touch-sne on independent stream? If so, please
> speak up!
>
> Thanks
>
> Michael
> on behalf of all chairs
>
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email