[tcpm] Weekly github digest (RFC8312bis Activity Summary)

Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 19 September 2021 08:56 UTC

Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB453A22E2 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 01:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=eu2Xe+2b; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=G8nLgvxN
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4NvGSe1izyjn for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 01:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C0713A22E0 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 01:56:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A420C3200684 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 03:39:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 19 Sep 2021 03:39:06 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject; s=fm3; bh=2htx95bt5s0 MC0qML4qYhVu+cQNPbWRwraOjcRKQp5Y=; b=eu2Xe+2bW9N9iFEgMU2mcqTAv8g 5ZH+c+GOOdTyoxXLd2CmoMNmntaWRp1lia8ipOR+3wwhljJrVlzLUDYzXU2DYK61 E8mQeRhjaYQ0ONhbyqyVQViZlEwjoFquljmkGaBVKFldA1IHe6HeltOB1Prhs25A Ft/G2svmi3J78WzzD/9WhfsYFOkFWZg3PX77f1nM1k9HxYAeFl5OrjXLzO+LX2pc boMcHiO/ILevMGx7OO+v4WlWqdv8ffkWJkB+yoSozek8u7NgC7sVD4yHADaoUSNy tp5DAbf1F7o/q9Sf9+qlcjLymHTLA+eb6417cZXtZcuKsQJjyCm0ckUjtog==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:from:mime-version:subject:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; bh=2htx95bt5s0MC0qML4qYhVu+cQNPbWRwraOjcRKQp5Y=; b=G8nLgvxN wk7hzm5QMmkweZCa29jeLmW58BNfd92Ji0fCJj2XSEaPVk1MkmqRrkriffSNh6xT Gq2QHDkR2NqE5sYs8XhakuK337aaQLKDhy/l7WFM/8rBbKIfcFWpfUkv6IsbhxRE pvBD9bj+2zfen6WZDqKjqNdRjPWsGIVyeE/Wjy6EGOAErLCjUaOl5av6RCfd48R/ fYH0n6LiJ5m8jY9EcDN/B+vzLFjAnjXo4Effk3z5YV3agrgQ3vKbK1ijGZ+tj/Hr 0e34m7zXWMaxKOD458Ya7gPWtha0yCTp/xVodlSeLtqjSk9n8h4mOB7xv8v4AO/s BD4XxoMbEMU5fA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:GulGYWWvRAOeb_sAqPbQ6F7RS-mFqelBtQLyFZhRS7PjoiwpETXgSg> <xme:GulGYSmI5aguqtzU-k2h2SPkJjbfoXFiX_Rwo4uxKWDla6O8ZF8pP3Lo9N4WXYj5x IyxtuiyucECLIMdOw>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:GulGYaYnPC1g-T-sJO4IDLd1rH4qL90BXvjD91y9FBo9SyyZe4AfzG_DAyaH50_F2p8JvPVDvYmkOWhd8NUtiJmrxzgdQPdZDMffpGp3F0iz3GmEgBlD2TQAtB2-WNM0sM50jg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrudehledguddukecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecupfhoucgurghtvgcufhhivghlugculdegledmne cujfgurheptggghffvufesrgdttdertddtjeenucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhih ucettghtihhvihhthicuufhumhhmrghrhicuuehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhi esmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeu gfefhfetteevgeffkefffeetffdvleehudeiteenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrd gtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepvdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep ughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:GulGYdVxJxTEmieqG7K3rR5-nVEEDlXhurYTF6KaVCxJyiONd2zpdQ> <xmx:GulGYQmasOdvHtFju_676mTKqU-xcS93l39RQVUnfQPP_VnNx0b8vA> <xmx:GulGYSdIyJ8qa4nL1swoQ7LgRmwtMHo35HeAfQMIPU7v2MDUbFh0Aw> <xmx:GulGYVx_hyQ9VXPyPhreseCyS-1kAV0Pd5BtDw4FiUzukgoirBHyUQ>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 03:39:06 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============1022008991790101493=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: tcpm@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20210919085611.1C0713A22E0@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 01:56:10 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/RIHPf-Io2Y7G459rDgYyloFMp1U>
Subject: [tcpm] Weekly github digest (RFC8312bis Activity Summary)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 08:56:16 -0000



Events 

Issues
------
* NTAP/rfc8312bis (+1/-4/💬35)
  1 issues created:
  - AIMD -> Reno (by larseggert)
    https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/108 

  16 issues received 35 new comments:
  - #101 (upon receiving) an ACK (2 by larseggert, markkukojo)
    https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/101 
  - #100 epoch_start (1 by larseggert)
    https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/100 
  - #98 Sec 5.9 (3 by bbriscoe, larseggert)
    https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/98 
  - #97 Sec 5.8 (3 by bbriscoe, larseggert)
    https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/97 
  - #96 Sec 5.6 (2 by bbriscoe, larseggert)
    https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/96 
  - #94 Sec 5.4 (2 by bbriscoe, larseggert)
    https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/94 
  - #93 Sec 5.3 (1 by larseggert)
    https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/93 
  - #92 Sec 5.1 (2 by larseggert, lisongxu)
    https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/92 
  - #91 Discussion in Sec 5. brings up surprisingly little data (1 by larseggert)
    https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/91 
  - #90 Citing Experimental RFCs as if being a part of CUBIC (3 by larseggert, markkukojo)
    https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/90 [WG LC] 
  - #89 Contribution to buffer bloat and slower convergence due to   larger decrease factor (3 by bbriscoe, goelvidhi)
    https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/89 
  - #88 Fairness to AIMD congestion control (1 by larseggert)
    https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/88 
  - #87 RACK (and QUIC) (3 by bbriscoe, goelvidhi, larseggert)
    https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/87 
  - #86 Slow-Start Overshoot w/ loss-based congestion conrol (1 by bbriscoe)
    https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/86 
  - #85 RFC 8511 handling of ECE signal (slow start vs congestion avoidance) (4 by bbriscoe, goelvidhi, larseggert)
    https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/85 
  - #84 RFC 8311 updates sender's response to CE / ECE (3 by bbriscoe, goelvidhi, larseggert)
    https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/84 

  4 issues closed:
  - Citing Experimental RFCs as if being a part of CUBIC https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/90 [WG LC] 
  - epoch_start https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/100 
  - Section 8 https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/99 
  - (upon receiving) an ACK https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/101 



Pull requests
-------------
* NTAP/rfc8312bis (+4/-4/💬3)
  4 pull requests submitted:
  - Add ietf.json (by larseggert)
    https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/pull/112 
  - Rephrase text around algorithmic alternatives. (by larseggert)
    https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/pull/111 
  - Use "new ACK" in more places, and define it. (by larseggert)
    https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/pull/110 
  - AIMD -> Reno (in most places) (by larseggert)
    https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/pull/109 

  3 pull requests received 3 new comments:
  - #110 Use "new ACK" in more places, and define it. (1 by markkukojo)
    https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/pull/110 
  - #109 AIMD -> Reno (in most places) (1 by lisongxu)
    https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/pull/109 
  - #103 upon receiving an ACK -> upon receiving a new ACK (1 by markkukojo)
    https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/pull/103 

  4 pull requests merged:
  - Add ietf.json
    https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/pull/112 
  - Update 5681.
    https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/pull/105 
  - current standard -> currently most widely deployed standard
    https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/pull/104 
  - upon receiving an ACK -> upon receiving a new ACK
    https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/pull/103 


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis