Re: [tcpm] Intended status of draft-ietf-tcpm-rack

Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@apple.com> Wed, 20 November 2019 03:26 UTC

Return-Path: <cpaasch@apple.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C32812023E for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 19:26:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=apple.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k4nGBL_SKXIe for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 19:26:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nwk-aaemail-lapp02.apple.com (nwk-aaemail-lapp02.apple.com [17.151.62.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF2CC120236 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 19:26:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (nwk-aaemail-lapp02.apple.com [127.0.0.1]) by nwk-aaemail-lapp02.apple.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xAK37V4m003176; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 19:26:16 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apple.com; h=sender : content-type : mime-version : subject : from : in-reply-to : date : cc : content-transfer-encoding : message-id : references : to; s=20180706; bh=FhA6oXh7yI9f9IgacwhYrLLmdgOAGpnknDEzzRGNGP4=; b=GHnKQzChxfsLsTGtPU/Jo1O5S8anBNMqwBfImiksfHynb3FHfQd6cxl2dpxAflGZczDN uebIhPyzHnbBMHfJnyrXlHOgbB6xon/Y3ZHaLYN5B4zcI7TfJ1Xn98M/ujdG4tebur34 ziGZFoC7LXN8BLBfZJhJy6uEqb0pJYkhnkD1CPlMSrquTsN6D09a/6Jzgov4zRXzvBib n5JeedbCLTzs79xr0b44g2APch3S6qUGsrJP0Qmgj63kNvgYfUnpnyH9u5oOYloM0vdS ZdfhqGIgNS+lqTxAwozwdFnnOUTEbRynfWCMoZ8aUiAgEZC1aaGQS7BltI5TTQiYmfbL Qw==
Received: from sg3-postinop-sz01.asia.apple.com (sg3-postinop-sz01.asia.apple.com [17.84.80.96]) by nwk-aaemail-lapp02.apple.com with ESMTP id 2waejneabk-2 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 19 Nov 2019 19:26:16 -0800
Received: from sng-mmpp-sz02.asia.apple.com (sng-mmpp-sz02.asia.apple.com [17.84.80.27]) by sg3-postinop-sz01.asia.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.2.4.20190507 64bit (built May 7 2019)) with ESMTPS id <0Q19002R407RG000@sg3-postinop-sz01.asia.apple.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 11:26:15 +0800 (+08)
Received: from process_milters-daemon.sng-mmpp-sz02.asia.apple.com by sng-mmpp-sz02.asia.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.2.5.20190826 64bit (built Aug 26 2019)) id <0Q1800H00XKVNK00@sng-mmpp-sz02.asia.apple.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 11:26:15 +0800 (+08)
X-Va-A:
X-Va-T-CD: 8ff8da7a88ca0804b8c9d6489183f540
X-Va-E-CD: 95019b26206f3a4f0e9452ea411b95f0
X-Va-R-CD: dccf78097554b2aee128a81a83535b58
X-Va-CD: 0
X-Va-ID: 43557fdb-a916-4051-a11d-d0af8e8714a2
X-V-A:
X-V-T-CD: 8ff8da7a88ca0804b8c9d6489183f540
X-V-E-CD: 95019b26206f3a4f0e9452ea411b95f0
X-V-R-CD: dccf78097554b2aee128a81a83535b58
X-V-CD: 0
X-V-ID: d040984f-1775-4fd5-9742-638ee14ebf6e
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-11-19_08:,, signatures=0
Received: from [17.235.155.46] by sng-mmpp-sz02.asia.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.2.5.20190826 64bit (built Aug 26 2019)) with ESMTPSA id <0Q1900L2007KFP30@sng-mmpp-sz02.asia.apple.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 11:26:10 +0800 (+08)
Sender: cpaasch@apple.com
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3601.0.10\))
From: Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <F9130FD0-C761-4225-9A13-2F68240D455A@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 11:26:07 +0800
Cc: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Message-id: <E4C9161E-05C2-4D28-92DD-060079E46B8F@apple.com>
References: <HE1PR07MB44256AB7B0B3864F67CD538EC24C0@HE1PR07MB4425.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <F9130FD0-C761-4225-9A13-2F68240D455A@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3601.0.10)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-11-19_08:, , signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/RVXJQ_gqffJjR539b3LBQdCHFuo>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Intended status of draft-ietf-tcpm-rack
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 03:26:24 -0000


> On Nov 19, 2019, at 7:06 PM, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 19 Nov, 2019, at 6:51 pm, Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>> 
>> I am also in support of proposed standard for draft-ietf-tcpm-rack as this
>> can potentially relax the strict ordering requirements in 5G deployments. I
>> am not 100% certain of the actual value of proposed standard vs experimental
>> ditto outside IETF but it is definitely not of negative impact. 
>> 
>> A question (perhaps already discussed on the mailing list): 
>> How widely do you think that RACK will be deployed in TCP stacks in the near
>> and more far perspective?. 
>> I know that it is already in Linux. What about MS Windows, FreeBSD, IOS,
>> Android ??
> 
> Android is Linux, to a first approximation, and thus inherits its networking capabilities.
> 
> FreeBSD I understand has a RACK-capable TCP stack, but which is not the default.  I think Rod Grimes should be able to clarify this, and he's also on this list.
> 
> Apple devices I do not know for sure about.

We do not have an implementation of RACK in our TCP stack.


Regardless of that, I support PS as the intended status for RACK.


Christoph


> 
> - Jonathan Morton
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm