IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-14

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Mon, 08 June 2020 13:00 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135393A0A68; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 06:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2LbpzyPJKEoA; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 06:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32b.google.com (mail-wm1-x32b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFD153A09C8; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 06:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id f185so16424878wmf.3; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 06:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=PezupVxffBsn3WSRy83cfYRQCtmvm1W8iBMsC/NqOSk=; b=HwW4bHZ0d4A6aVw6riiJ6DMdk21cmZqvYI7vXsXIMlL7SdtAcQ1Xlkm2y8ogDnovoT gA/8G6GcpnvvvaePMABVq17TX5JW9FNi/OpZNYctP7zMbq4dgQQLfQq9pfVa7LmoJk65 HeNNawXlOde8xN5TqOMuYDyT/3kX+jexvDCr9Ls+hxnucKwgPv5V1Xd5J7dAuGWJGl0d 8ErkyyIwyJljgZEK+USySHET7J71I0StJ7z3TU8nEbgFL1Ooi6No1vhjdRh/vNTYcMSg kQHTksyUFNmhXkWTxjQO6kZJsmrkXwyNl+UKIEogbFII/4nMSlZn/8jj5P1du0wYFspl gveQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=PezupVxffBsn3WSRy83cfYRQCtmvm1W8iBMsC/NqOSk=; b=Z+c8Rm+GeSTu2XIuKfTUcqUy/lkdGdjVcZrsbyqaziBKsqVvXodZaCv6hWYdZG78wx CrBnvnPTYa9YFQy3JsdwyyT1LA+M67PzWvLhT09ZatHfejVmCEuQ9N1ox8/y7S/uav0l TgcNfOv71l17EKil32MhcxinHn1r6kmGfs8aZFgqxL0ShMrKwpofTeQ7ZwBTGGdyb1dz t5iztN0fBNyyyXO7zfQ2iiCeahXuAWVRTcwEZsqMGK76FD2PAVCXUJf7mqfT82rgfDYV wL8wBugCgZSQAsRqI4IoQV2PGXJbaSJr9nEDjJUQ3cpxiiUbeS7q0VzW/uXLv8dZtcQW Gfyg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531/EaUPv0I4SjPowePDbo2Y0KctYq0gHVXW1a2STvLsh26PPo6G LS+jPRguEkSInurA8yNgpbI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzBsp28IBE5Vu+uvV58y9FWRRc0IV/Lgz0+danKSPDbvb3K0pKOSbGD6ATfOBs+2/Ri/adL1g==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:98cc:: with SMTP id a195mr16242923wme.89.1591621225308; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 06:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.46] ([62.3.64.16]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t188sm18156722wmt.27.2020.06.08.06.00.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Jun 2020 06:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2993fb2a-a21c-5f61-bb1d-88c87ad95ed1@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 13:59:53 +0100
Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>, last-call@ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org, tcpm@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider.all@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E7C9F582-8E88-4D9E-8771-088710938665@gmail.com>
References: <159083802039.5596.14695350463305243689@ietfa.amsl.com> <FE0FA7D5-176D-4111-95DA-BD5424A24FE2@icir.org> <4f52479e-1184-9277-66e5-6278eda95e0b@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <20200607171136.GT58497@mit.edu> <2993fb2a-a21c-5f61-bb1d-88c87ad95ed1@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
To: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/RXm-gHuWTdqm_7wyDbgVTDp8C8Y>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-14
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 13:00:30 -0000

> 
> 
> I agree "tunnels" are everywhere - if it's a tunnel, then the path may cross the Internet, and the considerations concerning path congestion and RTT variation should be relevant.
> 
> If it's known to be link-local or within a "controlled environment" then one could choose different constants.
> 
> I'll expect Mark can propose some appropriate words.

Clarifying that would help with many of the issues that I am concerned about.

Stewart

> 
> Gorry
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email