[tcpm] rfc5961 and suggested updates.

Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@gmail.com> Fri, 24 August 2018 13:39 UTC

Return-Path: <loganaden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B95A127148 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 06:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B4HOFrrBthT9 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 06:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x235.google.com (mail-io0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA26F126BED for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 06:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x235.google.com with SMTP id q5-v6so3923533iop.3 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 06:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=tUzmwDTxDKJRZN7iubbXmz5mdpH28AbYg2qpim63OpA=; b=klAVd59R/iofsh/XPeT1S/f7BtQvxCCOagr8DbKfziAXyFrhxHdzxEWoNUxsNvvlcu Z4M8K9hx3755Aht/F7ytcHzvyfYv01mg7lBnbmNPbSqykpLK60o5RJ6W12JGAsyDej/x lTzT+OXwFvCsYeLRSaRmJf5iMmOTkL7xgN/rIgExPtNVA9bZ9C4idSi/5vNKVMWlraxs dmd7VwSwZCxs24Ml4vMJg27CqSIdm7i75p4F4BXRd+h23/71FY2M0JzUSHzf9HbcwwxO uGWqxbvyq4eotCv0Wa/RN6jcthdZVfgSG8m2DEdWWTayK+Pr48E8C2MNr0xrniB40puW jJwA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=tUzmwDTxDKJRZN7iubbXmz5mdpH28AbYg2qpim63OpA=; b=hTW8bhTAprp9wDeDi1+VxB/Sc4iEk7cUH8fJwqSdiFKRDYBqEcMBq5RyYqZd3Wgxbc bwAU8medD61ON/HFNGpb+AxO89LI22VzmyIEdsU2CRTYRExU6VhH5mU502p5aXAB/dcp /9WgoVJiS26MSCFSZJxslfq/jOUl0ut/Od+llQ6/ZjZUCX/vZl5D+CDwXk1LjtK8qSyf nvzV9sqsK02VU5m5Fag0hPXogHIPfFWtKP80M0STFQoQaVjY3DgJEWUBPaA6qtS6Qyma gjkELQYg/np07MWn3bZx4QQBZkmNGtU+Bre6SFbpR0aEcheWB5DbOP+Pk5Q1vSBgR5+5 1crA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51AKVrUuVMI1Utz6m3WYwNzmr0Ot/Ph9i8dYr7UuPrNyr7V5zhKn QO4I+KRjc8EZIceyL0ZHV1bNekpDgPDRDXgHwNLDgR/u
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdZxVdOezbv0B44qrPYxtHMBH7ZSqTxKnuHQkIEBQG0/MNWnS+9sxhtarzIDqPIWpvu8WhPIk/1NVJHC7KGfFqI=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:24a:: with SMTP id 71-v6mr1209769ioc.191.1535117966853; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 06:39:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a4f:f741:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 06:39:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 17:39:26 +0400
Message-ID: <CAOp4FwQqfJh6QiNbtcaH83gbZm+iPK5zpTCvje0W+Tpz+fjNng@mail.gmail.com>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>, =?UTF-8?Q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind?= <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/RqrQOkR7gQuPPm5j7tm4_zukEBQ>
Subject: [tcpm] rfc5961 and suggested updates.
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:39:31 -0000

Hello folks,

I realized a few days ago that this draft:
draft-lvelvindron-ack-throttling-02

was referenced here (slide 34):
https://data.hackinn.com/ppt/2018%E7%9C%8B%E9%9B%AA%E5%BC%80%E5%8F%91%E8%80%85%E5%B3%B0%E4%BC%9A/TCP%E7%9A%84%E5%8E%84%E8%BF%90%EF%BC%8C%E7%BD%91%E7%BB%9C%E5%8D%8F%E8%AE%AE%E4%BE%A7%E4%BF%A1%E9%81%93%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90%E5%8F%8A%E5%88%A9%E7%94%A8.pdf

There were some objections at the time regarding whether to update
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5961 or not:

https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/current/msg10433.html

Since the draft is referenced, I would consider doing some more work
for an independent submission that clarifies rfc5961 or even an
informational WG document. We can clarify section 7 and leave the
deprecation out of the draft, as Joe disagreed on this part.

I would like to hear opinions.