Re: [tcpm] IETF 114 TCPM WG

Hi Susan

Sorry I have not created the draft yet as it’s a “future” draft that I plan
to submit after IETF.

Thanks

Gyan

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 7:08 PM Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:

> Gyan and Michael:
>
>
>
> Thank you for working on this NG TCPM Yang model
>
>
>
> Does “cc” mean configuration or something else?
>
>
>
> Sue
>
>
>
> *From:* Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 26, 2022 6:53 PM
> *To:* Michael Tuexen <michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
> *Cc:* Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>; Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>;
> Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>; Scharf, Michael <
> Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>; Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>; Van De
> Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>; tcpm
> IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [tcpm] IETF 114 TCPM WG - NG TCPM Yang Model
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Michael
>
>
>
> In-line
>
>
>
> Kind Regards
>
>
>
> Gyan
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 6:19 PM Michael Tuexen <
> michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Dear TCPM
> >
> > Attached is the slide deck for the NG TCP Yang model discussion.
> >
> > Sue, Robert, Jeff, Gunter
> >
> > Please review and let me know if I missed any talking points for the NG
> TCP Yang model.
> A couple of clarifying questions related to slide "What to add to NG TCP
> Yang Model?",
> especially since I know almost nothing about YANG:
>
> • All TCP states part of the FSM state machine.
> Understood.
>
>
>
>      Ack
>
>
> • All TCP flags and respective states.
> Do you mean the TCP flags SYN, FIN, PSH, ... Does a YANG module all to
> describe
> packets sent and received?
> • All TCP parameters that would be accessible with a local OS kernel hook.
> Doesn't that mean the complete set of state variable the kernel has and
> isn't that implementation dependent?
>
>
>
>      Yes
>
>
> • All windowing parameters including window scaling as well as any
> windowing related optimizations.
> You mean the receiver window including the window scaling.
>
>
>
>      Yes
>
>
> • All TCP options and optimizations set such as Selective ACK.
> I guess you mean the set of TCP extensions which have been negotiated.
>
>
>
>     Yes
>
>
> • All TCP slow start congestion control parameters CWIN etc.
> There are a multiple Congestion Controls, even ones not being specified by
> the IETF.
>
>
>
>     Yes
>
>
> So this might get very hard to do. Or do you require a specific CC when
> using TCP for BGP?
>
>
>
>     What is CC ? Let’s discuss this on Friday
>
>
> Best regards
> Michael
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Gyan
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> > From: Mishra, Gyan S <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>
> > Date: Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 11:36 PM
> > Subject: IETF 114 TCPM WG - NG TCPM Yang Model
> > To: Hayabusanew <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > Gyan Mishra
> > Network Solutions Architect
> > Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com
> > M 301 502-1347
> >
> >
> > <IETF-114 TCPM TCP Yang
> Model.pdf>_______________________________________________
> > tcpm mailing list
> > tcpm@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
>
> --
>
> <http://www.verizon.com/>
>
> *Gyan Mishra*
>
> *Network Solutions Architect *
>
> *Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>*
>
> *M 301 502-1347*
>
>
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>*

*M 301 502-1347*