[tcpm] poll for adoption of long connectivity disruptions draft

"Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[Verizon]" <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov> Tue, 01 September 2009 19:28 UTC

Return-Path: <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9FD3A6A42 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:28:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.484
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.484 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.115, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UcCtCD6smbeW for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:28:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndmsnpf01.ndc.nasa.gov (ndmsnpf01.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.0.121]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FA03A68A5 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:28:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndjsppt03.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjsppt03.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.102]) by ndmsnpf01.ndc.nasa.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B797260357 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:27:44 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ndjshub06.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjshub06.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.4.165]) by ndjsppt03.ndc.nasa.gov (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n81JRinW015174 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:27:44 -0500
Received: from NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.4.166]) by ndjshub06.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.4.165]) with mapi; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:27:44 -0500
From: "Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[Verizon]" <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:27:43 -0500
Thread-Topic: poll for adoption of long connectivity disruptions draft
Thread-Index: AcorOkcQoJjUMfz3QWuTzmBHEhBvFw==
Message-ID: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB479B8A30CD@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.7400:2.4.4, 1.2.40, 4.0.166 definitions=2009-09-01_14:2009-08-26, 2009-09-01, 2009-09-01 signatures=0
Subject: [tcpm] poll for adoption of long connectivity disruptions draft
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:28:24 -0000

Hello, the authors of the "Long Connectivity Disruptions" draft:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zimmermann-tcp-lcd-02.txt
have given a couple presentations to the WG now and asked if it
could be considered as an item for the WG for Experimental.  If
I'm not mistaken, there has been some positive feedback on the
most recent incarnation, though not a lot, and not really any
negative feedback that I could see.

As chairs, David and I are asking the WG to voice whether we should:

A) adopt this as a WG item for Experimental
B) NOT adopt this as a WG item
C) wait to decide (not ready)

Please let us know what you think.

---------------------------
Wes Eddy
Network & Systems Architect
Verizon FNS / NASA GRC
Office: (216) 433-6682
---------------------------