IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Additional editorial comments on draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-20

Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Mon, 07 June 2021 03:05 UTC

Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F2D3A3326 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 20:05:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id huNPDi2LhzFK for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 20:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72d.google.com (mail-qk1-x72d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58B7C3A3325 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 20:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72d.google.com with SMTP id j62so1597967qke.10 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 20:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=wSRf03IGYfcMswRmBNpQ+hC1hR3RK0dGmZ7Hm+tGAnQ=; b=loL5EeCuWybuR8jlMPDJ/mNPIYf9gEERZ8b+PU4tbaKTRlssDpPXSDfrQ2uuRJ5Ow9 9EptREAEPPPbojo005TM/rmL69jduHGDO02++Se3LckPUdr8BY53Dp1ONBOktXHBTJZd cTF6YA6+nOsk7+G1ClPMhmFALFDCtyQa6SXCZHWUfnMTT2RnPCbdd4SvXop3wSSmmcFY o8Ar5nAgmgTovBWpJNSlEk2saNATi5RbvIUi4aOCFJs2oPT3tGOhdj+D2AwmzDf8pg3C DgG8YhcvXaG+QH6bNZc6s4lsprTwrF/gH4fess0UjI5lDgVt0JfkCvNQq7F0kLfZnah3 vkPA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=wSRf03IGYfcMswRmBNpQ+hC1hR3RK0dGmZ7Hm+tGAnQ=; b=WYPJI5QnbG//pgGdZkFguKvMAWBH455nEkQeZ2KSC+2xTr7zZuzKE3/f6IXzk4JPXJ iA+MmxHmj/pHxEhLaYbbkLRO+T743iV8y9wBOtXe+WX3OsoN9ENDgq/UxkMFweyAjmOD 4FgXQ1nUu72gZFYDRC8eAHlhXW5zdbC2cba/+NSYXBYSEjddrFOzj09kASH7WtkkIhwC wPscNfZIGzGl0u14UdsM6+QaTOwhTJfXFb13MDl3bpE5FAmP/vbmZUaNiOTl5d0Aowv5 i/++rIAu//xYWq+AbxZiSZKaT40r9Y3ZP9Jm9QS5yrcpElTkpYuZC5ZRs5KgjtE078dj WEYg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530+EH0tTvHB2uNa0k5ybrx9EDxWaZ7Q3RyFp3pdiU09YJpN1lYh ZH+cFm3OTUjroGcKR1EdQzlWs7CRAyg9UO8m
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxkMl73dEcFDWBP/DQ0RQT4Z7/L7kl1ci3tmBbZP70/krIQtNoUph9MtWdyxCukJAEHPBae/w==
X-Received: by 2002:ae9:c30f:: with SMTP id n15mr14113469qkg.71.1623035112099; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 20:05:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.14] (cpe-174-102-117-3.columbus.res.rr.com. [174.102.117.3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k19sm3176301qkj.89.2021.06.06.20.05.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 06 Jun 2021 20:05:11 -0700 (PDT)
To: tuexen@fh-muenster.de
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
References: <62b0a3c2-3ec5-c3d9-7a1c-909e11a23d0c@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <3ece7e28-c247-f980-3f31-5ea64314fff3@mti-systems.com> <025CE34B-A2DC-409C-9A2B-B5D7A4E826B1@fh-muenster.de>
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Message-ID: <86a03630-a462-aa04-df80-c7fcf4b5fbe3@mti-systems.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 23:05:05 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <025CE34B-A2DC-409C-9A2B-B5D7A4E826B1@fh-muenster.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/SbTXTOwtPHchmfb4I7P_tqpWDO8>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Additional editorial comments on draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-20
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2021 03:05:20 -0000

Thanks Michael, the fix you mention below is in my working copy of the 
next -23 revision, but I just wanted to point out that it looks like 
this is minor issue of extra indentation is from the original RFC 793.  
I'm assuming it's obvious that we want to fix it, and just pointing this 
out to the working group for completeness.


On 6/3/2021 5:47 AM, tuexen@fh-muenster.de wrote:
> Hi Wes,
>
> I found one more issue on page 79/80.
>
> OLD
>                 SYN-RECEIVED STATE
>
>                    If SND.UNA < SEG.ACK =< SND.NXT then enter ESTABLISHED
>                    state and continue processing with variables below set
>                    to:
>
>                       SND.WND <- SEG.WND
>                       SND.WL1 <- SEG.SEQ
>                       SND.WL2 <- SEG.ACK
>
>                       If the segment acknowledgment is not acceptable,
>                       form a reset segment,
>
>                          <SEQ=SEG.ACK><CTL=RST>
>
>                       and send it.
> NEW
>                 SYN-RECEIVED STATE
>
>                    If SND.UNA < SEG.ACK =< SND.NXT then enter ESTABLISHED
>                    state and continue processing with variables below set
>                    to:
>
>                       SND.WND <- SEG.WND
>                       SND.WL1 <- SEG.SEQ
>                       SND.WL2 <- SEG.ACK
>
>                    If the segment acknowledgment is not acceptable,
>                    form a reset segment,
>
>                       <SEQ=SEG.ACK><CTL=RST>
>
>                    and send it.
>
> The change is only the indentation of the last sentence.
>
> Best regards
> Michael
>> _______________________________________________
>> tcpm mailing list
>> tcpm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email