Re: [tcpm] WG status update
Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Thu, 11 November 2010 01:45 UTC
Return-Path: <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 566F23A68D3 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:45:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.129, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 75G0zBwQ8AQS for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:45:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mgw-sa01.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [147.243.1.47]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D03B3A68CF for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:45:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.fit.nokia.com (esdhcp030222.research.nokia.com [172.21.30.222]) by mgw-sa01.nokia.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id oAB1jQJH021020 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Nov 2010 03:45:26 +0200
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.4 at fit.nokia.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <5FDC413D5FA246468C200652D63E627A0B54DF67@LDCMVEXC1-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:45:09 +0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B4B6798F-9A14-4A6E-9112-7F3A3CB5D12C@nokia.com>
References: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB4821F155C3@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov> <5FDC413D5FA246468C200652D63E627A0B54DF67@LDCMVEXC1-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
To: Richard Scheffenegger <rs@netapp.com>, Murari Sridharan <muraris@microsoft.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (mail.fit.nokia.com); Thu, 11 Nov 2010 03:45:15 +0200 (EET)
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] WG status update
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 01:45:01 -0000
Hi, I may be confused, but I thought Murari said that an updater was pending. If there isn't, this can of course be adopted now. And as an individual contributor, I'd like to see that, as well as Cubic. Lars On 2010-11-10, at 20:35, Scheffenegger, Richard wrote: > > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sridharan-tcpm-ctcp-02 > Status: polled for interest on 6/16/10 > one positive response; no negative - too weak for adoption > > > I have been under the impression, that Lars specifically approached the > authors to update and resubmit a new revision of the draft, before this > can move forward. > > For the record, I share the opinion of Anumita (adopt this as WG item, > updated with the most recent studies on stability / ICCRG input). > > Ditto for draft-rhee-tcpm-cubic > > > Richard Scheffenegger > _______________________________________________ > tcpm mailing list > tcpm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
- [tcpm] WG status update Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]
- Re: [tcpm] WG status update Mark Allman
- Re: [tcpm] WG status update Fernando Gont
- [tcpm] WG status update Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[Verizon]
- Re: [tcpm] WG status update Alexander Zimmermann
- [tcpm] WG status update Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]
- Re: [tcpm] WG status update Bruno Mongazon-Cazavet
- Re: [tcpm] WG status update Scheffenegger, Richard
- Re: [tcpm] WG status update Scheffenegger, Richard
- Re: [tcpm] WG status update Lars Eggert
- Re: [tcpm] WG status update Murari Sridharan
- Re: [tcpm] WG status update Bruno Mongazon-Cazavet
- Re: [tcpm] WG status update Lars Eggert
- Re: [tcpm] WG status update Bruno Mongazon-Cazavet
- Re: [tcpm] WG status update Lars Eggert
- Re: [tcpm] WG status update L.Wood
- [tcpm] MPTCP vs Rehash (was TCPM WG status update) Costin Raiciu
- Re: [tcpm] MPTCP vs Rehash (was TCPM WG status up… Bruno Mongazon-Cazavet
- Re: [tcpm] WG status update Lars Eggert
- Re: [tcpm] WG status update Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] WG status update Bruno Mongazon-Cazavet