[tcpm] Open questions in draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp-03

"Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de> Thu, 28 November 2019 18:37 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA3D120809; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 10:37:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hs-esslingen.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kaUAxCeV_96d; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 10:37:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hs-esslingen.de (mail.hs-esslingen.de [134.108.32.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F1801208B7; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 10:37:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hs-esslingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593AB25A12; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 19:37:01 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hs-esslingen.de; s=mail; t=1574966221; bh=7RUf0HM9XERJjKVBAy64VCkQ9lvbtqFa9n0XbQuTLTU=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:From; b=LTQc+U6ejU4M9z5/J+Jcsau2Yjh/c7TDUITb7XPvPNouC2ufAvm+IKZkISwzx+l3N MwZNqOQN5z2r0nBafvwC6ItYklujZ88FaaHazIAlhFDqGwdJhry0T5INqLM/3+GiJs Oo+/4ioCVqkio0hIAl2YBOC9JPo+LAHdf9LkXDzI=
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.7.1 (20120429) (Debian) at hs-esslingen.de
Received: from mail.hs-esslingen.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hs-esslingen.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1XBHjwZQPyGX; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 19:37:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from rznt8101.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de (rznt8101.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de [134.108.29.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hs-esslingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 19:37:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from RZNT8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de ([169.254.3.242]) by rznt8101.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de ([fe80::bd73:d6a9:24d7:95f1%10]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 19:37:00 +0100
From: "Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
To: tcpm IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp@ietf.org" <draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Open questions in draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp-03
Thread-Index: AdWmGolxZReXGVxfT16zv56GRPhU5A==
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 18:37:00 +0000
Message-ID: <6EC6417807D9754DA64F3087E2E2E03E2D54D9D2@rznt8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [134.108.63.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/SuPwLbuAdWJCnW3zpnoLZOleGs0>
Subject: [tcpm] Open questions in draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp-03
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 18:37:05 -0000

[chair hat off]

At IETF 106 there was not enough time left for Mahesh to present the latest update of the document "YANG Model for Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) Configuration".

Mahesh, Vishal and me have significantly updated draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp-03 since the last meeting. The changes are summarized in the slides that can be found at:

   https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/materials/slides-106-tcpm-yang-model-for-transmission-control-protocol-tcp-configuration-01

Our proposal to refine the scope of the document. This results in at least 4 questions:

1. Should the model support statistics?

2. Should it model all TCP connections?

3. Add support for TCP-AO?

4. Add support for TCP-MD5?

The slide deck details why these four questions are relevant. At least the last two requirements originate from another IETF document (draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model).

The authors plan to further update the document and address open issues as far as possible. Therefore we seek guidance from the TCPM community on these questions. Feedback on the list (or off-list) would be highly welcome.

Thanks

Michael (on behalf of the authors)


PS: I'd like to note that the TCPM chairs usually try hard to give at least some time to all presentations on the agenda. While I believe that this is an important tradition in TCPM, I decided not to intervene last meeting in order to avoid an impression that an own document would be prioritized over other topics.