Re: [tcpm] WGLC for 793bis - REVIEW NEEDED
Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Wed, 14 October 2020 21:17 UTC
Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA5F3A1094 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 14:17:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.112
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.112 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.213, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iV3NjQSjU9PZ for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 14:17:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x132.google.com (mail-il1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F8403A1091 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 14:17:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x132.google.com with SMTP id q1so1249874ilt.6 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 14:17:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=3s4hw+Z/AAsqwhEki4QQTuIlo8F30FX6zS4yFjuKb+U=; b=fYEFqOj/uZ924tpVKssjRN8z4ChyDO8x5L4r4l76xKYdT0a8NLJqD42jbl8q+xTbkP c3zTVYBAAjIusAfKB0oZYwdCcNzOaljej7hpt0z4Df7agmtf9+lAh/aTzn5wM8TIWfOE DpUdaaKm8Qwr9aFBzlC9Sf7iPcD5Pt3/QkEqsVEk9Gm+ehLHWk3n0Z9FPvwvPQxOd410 jH3LmCHavVQeA69F7MxAwqpE19PM3V3b4lfb/WzP0MD+ZovwL0rqncPIBQP1qjScIuQ9 ApN+ObLZVKSv3Pf2h83Yc+gGsIKzoTzw8nxs8icdbmhY4U5WfkkhJez88ITQLf92tBY+ +UKw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=3s4hw+Z/AAsqwhEki4QQTuIlo8F30FX6zS4yFjuKb+U=; b=Kx9kqYIYJW8KTeOpmtfx5CuFOX+TJvHVfXh8YQf1Nr7kUUeG9Cj6+P3WBCThAfQXxh 7kYnSVbcaLlCwzXEiBnYy2CBtkkPJnLp1TIUjQCMRnGgY0IorLOl9fsGZcQQEUBKcq60 N9joyrSkXVekP4riFTjljYMIoIU9aK5bfUWxwMik4n/ghH7+EAUBp8qk0lOWH8mq9oLI z8OMeyOkAprsOHvPKRIOZFUO9dvg0/uRfr38dHlKrtnmYJivIWeg22Xkuj6JdfyGCG8j pYC5wjMd7RgBVZfuz9bfIZbCHnhdg4E5fOWoUlFgXBw+CIIcB3B4XfvXyeBysYbW8qiC J0JA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531AGmbg5KHwNv8YajQFi9u6HF8pfN1JCMghFDLvUKkc5ZDl7pJn LWbS/qL/ZjBYhLEVHE3v33yOUEIcUknjgWuw
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxH9nrfPhaDNkzSMcFHskbb6iOs5eRQ55ptVMtO61TswYydiHk8ZljTDUdgl52BMyF/SM2Ejw==
X-Received: by 2002:a92:85d5:: with SMTP id f204mr956485ilh.108.1602710231978; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 14:17:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.14] (cpe-174-102-117-3.columbus.res.rr.com. [174.102.117.3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d14sm514771ilo.72.2020.10.14.14.17.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Oct 2020 14:17:10 -0700 (PDT)
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
References: <6EC6417807D9754DA64F3087E2E2E03E2DD8004B@rznt8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de> <25639_1601041936_5F6DF610_25639_379_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933031546B9F@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <9d420a13-aeca-a434-d079-b9a697fa9073@mti-systems.com> <29425_1602659963_5F86A67B_29425_486_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93303155FD52@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Message-ID: <23cf0ef2-9516-5c74-1094-b49bee7d2e6b@mti-systems.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 17:17:09 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <29425_1602659963_5F86A67B_29425_486_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93303155FD52@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/TKWrlgqZifkfPhc7gMlMghZrzDE>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] WGLC for 793bis - REVIEW NEEDED
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 21:17:15 -0000
On 10/14/2020 3:19 AM, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote: > Hi Wes, > > (1) looks good to me. > > For (3), you may consider tweaking the text so that the reco is on the TCP implem, not the application. That makes sense. In the working copy, I've changed the beginning of the sentence from: There MUST (MUST-33) be a way for the application to learn how much urgent data remains to be read from the connection, or at least to determine whether or not more urgent data remains to be read. to: The TCP implementation MUST (MUST-33) provide a way for the application to ... I think that addresses your point.
- [tcpm] WGLC for 793bis - REVIEW NEEDED Scharf, Michael
- Re: [tcpm] WGLC for 793bis - REVIEW NEEDED mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [tcpm] WGLC for 793bis - REVIEW NEEDED Wesley Eddy
- Re: [tcpm] WGLC for 793bis - REVIEW NEEDED mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [tcpm] WGLC for 793bis - REVIEW NEEDED Wesley Eddy
- Re: [tcpm] WGLC for 793bis - REVIEW NEEDED Joseph Touch
- Re: [tcpm] WGLC for 793bis - REVIEW NEEDED Wesley Eddy