Re: [tcpm] poll for adoption of draft-ananth-persist-02

["Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]" <[e-mail]>]

After reviewing this mailing list thread and the IETF 77
discussion, David and I think there's support to make
this a working group document.

As we see it, the path to take toward publication is:

1) authors submit a draft-ietf-tcpm version of the document
2) authors need to come to closure with several people who
   disagree with specification of a new socket option; this
   seems to be the main point of contention
3) issue a WGLC once consensus is determined for the socket
   option issue

--
Wes Eddy
MTI Systems


>-----Original Message-----
>From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
>Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]
>Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 2:50 PM
>To: [e-mail]
>Subject: [tcpm] poll for adoption of draft-ananth-persist-02
>
>The authors have updated draft-ananth-persist, and asked
>us to poll the TCPM WG to have this particular document
>adopted with an Informational target.
>
>http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ananth-tcpm-persist-02.txt
>
>This has been discussed to some extent on the mailing
>list and at the Dublin meeting.  The authors have
>responded to comments received thus far and updated the
>document as it grew from the outcome of prior feedback
>on the draft-mahesh-persist-timeout document.
>
>Please respond if you either:
>
>(1) Support making this document a WG document with the
>    target for Informational.
>
>(2) Oppose making this document a WG document.
>
>Of course, other comments are also welcome :).
>
>It's relatively short, so if people could respond in the
>next 2 weeks, this would allow us to determine consensus
>during the week of the IETF meeting.
>
>--
>Wes Eddy
>MTI Systems
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>tcpm mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm