[tcpm] Concluding CUBIC draft (chairs' views)

[Yoshifumi Nishida <[e-mail]>]

Hi folks,

The chairs had discussed how we can proceed and finalize the cubic draft.
Here's our current views. We would like to proceed with the draft along
with them if this looks reasonable to people.

1. The current consensus of the WG is still publishing the doc as a PS.

2. If we want to hold the publication, there must be solid evidence for the
risks in the draft. Otherwise, we will proceed with publishing the doc.

3. If some people think the current draft needs more explanations or hides
some facts, please propose some texts. It will be included in the draft
once the WG agrees.

4. In any case, the chairs will try to capture the discussion points in the
write-up for the draft in case further discussions are required.
    (it will be based on
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/Gxiy6iW6vl7bvhIWLwr72OUW6fI/ ,
but there will be editorial and minor changes)

If you have any comments, complaints, suggestions or else, please let us
know. Especially when you disagree with them.

Thanks,
--
Yoshi on behalf of tcpm co-chairs